We performed a comparison between FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) and SonicWall Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is easy to configure."
"The tool secures our critical applications, especially the mobile money application, which is often targeted by attacks. The solution provides rapid protection and has proven reliable against various threats."
"We use it to secure VMs and applications. It protects against DDoS attacks. It's very user-friendly."
"The platform's stability is good."
"It is good for web tracking applications."
"The most valuable features of the solution are SD-WAN, filtration, web filter, application filter, and IPS."
"The fact that I can log into the platform and see everybody, see logs, authentication failure, and see everything on one platform, is the most valuable feature."
"The machine learning feature reduces the false positives."
"The solution offers better data protection than competitors."
"Capture ATP is a good additional feature in the latest version."
"We use SonicWall Web Application Firewall for security and tunneling."
"FortiWeb Web Application Firewall's signature database updates could be improved."
"The technical support team is bad."
"FortiWeb Web Application Firewall needs to improve its performance."
"FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) needs to update its attack prevention database."
"There is room for improvement in the support. The response time could be faster. Plus, they ask for a lot of information. It is not easy to get support."
"We have encountered issues with webhooks and management of FortiWeb Web Application Firewall's on-premise version."
"There is room for improvement in pricing, and actually, the price is a bit higher because on the same terms I purchased, the support subscription is so high."
"The documentation is poor."
"We should get the logs from the solution, and it should communicate with the local DNS."
"The solution needs an access management feature with API integration so we can assign certain levels of access within groups."
"We have a lot of unknown errors popping up in the latest version."
More FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SonicWall Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) is ranked 16th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 13 reviews while SonicWall Web Application Firewall is ranked 25th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews. FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) is rated 8.0, while SonicWall Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) writes "Protects internal applications and prevents target attacks ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall Web Application Firewall writes "A stable and durable solution that can be used for security and tunneling". FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF and Azure Front Door, whereas SonicWall Web Application Firewall is most compared with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. See our FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) vs. SonicWall Web Application Firewall report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
