• Home
  • FileMaker vs. InterSystems Caché

FileMaker vs InterSystems Caché comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apple Logo
FileMaker
Read 5 FileMaker reviews
201 views|75 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
InterSystems Logo
InterSystems Caché
142 views|62 comparisons
Featured Review
Anonymous User
User-friendly, very stable, reasonable price, integrates well, and has all sorts of capabilities
I use it quite extensively for some of the stuff, and it is doing the job.
Use InterSystems Caché?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its price is pretty reasonable. I am at a university. We get educational discount pricing from most of the major vendors."

    • More FileMaker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
    Views
    201
    Comparisons
    75
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    10th
    out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
    Views
    142
    Comparisons
    62
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    FileMaker vs. Google BigTable
    May 2024
    Free Report: FileMaker vs. Google BigTable
    Find out what your peers are saying about FileMaker vs. Google BigTable and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    InterSystems Cache
    Learn More
    Apple
    InterSystems
    Overview
    Cross-platform relational database application
    Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications.
    Sample Customers
    VUHL, Reynolds Services Inc., Market Refrigeration Specialists, Sea Breeze Farm, Jordan Lindblad, Henry Schein Dental
    CysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA)
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization67%
    Healthcare Company15%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Recreational Facilities/Services Company3%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise66%
    Large Enterprise28%
    Buyer's Guide
    FileMaker vs. Oracle Berkeley DB
    May 2024
    Free Report: FileMaker vs. Oracle Berkeley DB
    Find out what your peers are saying about FileMaker vs. Oracle Berkeley DB and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    FileMaker is ranked 5th in Non-Relational Databases while InterSystems Caché is ranked 10th in Non-Relational Databases. FileMaker is rated 7.6, while InterSystems Caché is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of FileMaker writes "User-friendly, very stable, reasonable price, integrates well, and has all sorts of capabilities". On the other hand, FileMaker is most compared with FoxPro, whereas InterSystems Caché is most compared with .

    See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.