Entrust GetAccess vs IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Tareq Elqadah
reviewer287652
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Entrust GetAccess is its performance."

More Entrust GetAccess Pros →

"IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is a good solution. It's both stable and scalable."

More IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Pros →

Cons
"Entrust GetAccess is a very expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."

More Entrust GetAccess Cons →

"It would be better if the administration and configurations were more straightforward. The architectural level is also quite complex."

More IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We need to pay a yearly licensing fee for Entrust GetAccess, which is very expensive."
  • More Entrust GetAccess Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Our customers pay for the license every year or every three years. It's not available on a monthly basis."
  • More IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Entrust GetAccess is its performance.
    Top Answer:We need to pay a yearly licensing fee for Entrust GetAccess, which is very expensive.
    Top Answer:Entrust GetAccess is a very expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved.
    Top Answer:IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is a good solution. It's both stable and scalable.
    Top Answer:Our customers pay for the license every year or every three years. It's not available on a monthly basis.
    Top Answer:It would be better if the administration and configurations were more straightforward. The architectural level is also quite complex.
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    226
    Comparisons
    44
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    255
    Rating
    10.0
    4th
    Views
    101
    Comparisons
    43
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    305
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    GetAccess
    Tivoli Federated Identity Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    Entrust GetAccess is a solution to solve security objectives for automating processes for suppliers and partners, improving productivity and efficiency, or simply providing an invaluable peace of mind. The Entrust GetAccess Server has automated service discovery, integral fail-over and fail-back capabilities, and flexible multilevel centralized logging.
    IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager provides web and federated single sign-on (SSO) to users across multiple applications. It uses federated SSO for security-rich information sharing for private, public and hybrid cloud deployments. With it you can enable security-rich business collaboration in the cloud.
    Sample Customers
    Telia
    EXA Corporation

    Entrust GetAccess is ranked 1st in Web Access Management with 1 review while IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is ranked 4th in Web Access Management with 1 review. Entrust GetAccess is rated 10.0, while IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Entrust GetAccess writes "A scalable solution that can be used for hardware-based authentication". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager writes "A stable and scalable web security and identity management solution". Entrust GetAccess is most compared with , whereas IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is most compared with Symantec Siteminder.

    See our list of best Web Access Management vendors.

    We monitor all Web Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.