Comarch EHR vs Meditech Electronic Health Records comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Ranking
27th
out of 32 in EHR
Views
17
Comparisons
9
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
out of 32 in EHR
Views
1,673
Comparisons
784
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Comarch EHR is an IT system used for managing e-documentation in all kinds of medical service facilities. Central access to documents originating from various systems offers efficient gathering and processing of medical data. This innovative solution supports physicians in making the right diagnosis and saves time for patients and medical staff alike.

Meditech's electronic health record connects care across every setting, enabling clinicians to provide higher quality care, with greater efficiency, to more people.

Sample Customers
BP Global, Telefonica, Vodafone, Technicolor, Heathrow Airport
Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Healthcare Company35%
Computer Software Company8%
University8%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise66%

Comarch EHR is ranked 27th in EHR while Meditech Electronic Health Records is ranked 5th in EHR. Comarch EHR is rated 0.0, while Meditech Electronic Health Records is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Meditech Electronic Health Records writes "It is cloud-based, hence very secure in terms of information storage". Comarch EHR is most compared with , whereas Meditech Electronic Health Records is most compared with Cerner EMR, Epic Electronic Health Records, Allscripts Sunrise EHR, InterSystems TrakCare and Siemens Soarian.

See our list of best EHR vendors.

We monitor all EHR reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.