Citrix Analytics for Security vs Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Citrix Analytics for Security and Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA).
To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is easy to handle.""Very good scalability."

More Citrix Analytics for Security Pros →

"One or two people can maintain and support the solution. The maintenance is not difficult.""The most valuable features of the Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System are the AI detection and monitoring of common threats."

More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pros →

Cons
"Lacks recording features.""The remote access features need improvement."

More Citrix Analytics for Security Cons →

"The UI dashboard view needs to be improved because it is ugly. If it was more modern it would be better. Additionally, better integration with other databases would be good.""Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System can improve by having more anti-spam features that will hopefully eliminate all of the other threats."

More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is fairly priced. There are no additional costs involved, one only needs to pay the licensing cost."
  • More Citrix Analytics for Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of the solution is good. It is less expensive than the other solutions in the market. There are not any additional features or hidden costs."
  • More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is fairly priced. There are no additional costs involved, one only needs to pay the licensing cost.
    Top Answer:The remote access features need improvement.
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System are the AI detection and monitoring of common threats.
    Top Answer:The UI dashboard view needs to be improved because it is ugly. If it was more modern it would be better. Additionally, better integration with other databases would be good.
    Top Answer:We are using Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System to look for threats in our network, such as barriers and malicious software.
    Ranking
    Views
    160
    Comparisons
    98
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    306
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    64
    Comparisons
    54
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    433
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Citrix Analytics for Performance
    Hillstone sBDS
    Learn More
    Overview

    The future works with actionable insights
    Organizations have more rich data available to them than ever before, but data is only as good as the insights it provides and the actions you can take on it. Gathering this data can be unwieldy and making sense of it can be overwhelming. With machine learning applied to data that spans network traffic, users, files, and endpoints, you can identify and take action on user behavior and app performance.

    The Hillstone Server Breach Detection System (sBDS) adopts multiple threat detection technologies that include both traditional signature-based technology as well as large-scale threat intelligent data modeling and user behavioral analytics modeling, which provides an ideal solution to detect unknown or 0-day threat attacks, to protect high-value, critical servers and their sensitive data from being leaked or stolen. Together with deep threat hunting analysis capabilities and visibility, Hillstone sBDS provides security admins the effective means to detect IOCs (Indicators of Compromise) events, restore the threat attack kill chain and provide extensive visibility into threat intelligence analysis and mitigations.

    Sample Customers
    Scripps Health, Sydney University, Element Six, Lindex, SAS
    Norbert Wiener University, Regional Government of the Amazon
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: May 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Citrix Analytics for Security is ranked 18th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 2 reviews while Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is ranked 22nd in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 2 reviews. Citrix Analytics for Security is rated 8.0, while Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Citrix Analytics for Security writes "Helped the organization to provide high-security access to applications and performs well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System writes "Beneficial AI detection, helpful support, but modern UI needed". Citrix Analytics for Security is most compared with , whereas Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb.

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.