Cisco Secure Client vs Netskope Private Access comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
85 views|56 comparisons
Netskope Logo
1,761 views|1,118 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Client and Netskope Private Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA as a Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "When it comes to pricing, Netskope Private Access is relatively cheap compared to other solutions."
  • "I believe that the price for Netskope Private Access is included in the features or functionality my company purchased from NetSkope."
  • "It is not the most expensive option, being more affordable than Zscaler, but it's also not the most budget-friendly choice available."
  • "It is not cheap, but the value of the solution is there. It's worth the investment."
  • "Netskope Private Access is more inexpensive than other products."
  • "There was about 60% ROI, just in terms of savings. We had 40% to 60% reduction in monthly operational costs by using Netskope."
  • "The pricing of the solution is cheap."
  • "The tool's price is normal. It is not very cheap but good compared to the competitors."
  • More Netskope Private Access Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Even without extensive training, if you're a proficient IT professional, you can easily configure it.
    Top Answer:The solution needs to develop faster features. Its interoperability feature is not working. It takes six months to one year for any product to implement the improvements. However, the process should… more »
    Top Answer:I use Netskope Private Access for VPN access.
    Ranking
    27th
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    85
    Comparisons
    56
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    6th
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    1,761
    Comparisons
    1,118
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    651
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Secure Client harnesses the powerful industry-leading AnyConnect VPN/ZTNA and helps IT and security professionals manage dynamic and scalable endpoint security agents in a unified view.
    ​You achieve security compliance, and your users get to connect to your VPN quickly and easily. It's a win-win. ​Reduce your clients and enjoy advanced endpoint protection across control points within Secure Client.
    See all your security agents on one screen with Secure Client's single-cloud management console. Monitor endpoint application usage and user behavior when coupled with Cisco Secure Network Analytics.

    Netskope Private Access is an integral component of the Netskope Security Cloud platform that provides zero-trust secure access to enterprise applications and data in hybrid IT (public cloud and data center) environments. It offers comprehensive policy management, compliance assessment, and supports any application, protocol, and device to reduce risk and simplify security operations.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Evalueserve, Stroock, Apria, Ather Energy
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Non Profit14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    ZTNA as a Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Secure Client is ranked 27th in ZTNA as a Service while Netskope Private Access is ranked 6th in ZTNA as a Service with 14 reviews. Cisco Secure Client is rated 0.0, while Netskope Private Access is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netskope Private Access writes "Provides network visibility, infrastructure protection and advanced security protections, especially the DLP (Data Loss Protection)". Cisco Secure Client is most compared with , whereas Netskope Private Access is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Appgate SDP, Google BeyondCorp Remote Access and Perimeter 81.

    See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.