"The scalability is one of the best."
"The solution is extremely scalable. Our customers are regularly scaling up after installing Splunk."
"The solution is definitely scalable."
"This is a good security product."
"The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great."
"The most valuable feature is being able to take data and put it into other systems so that we could see the output, and to see where we need to apply our focus."
"It's straightforward in terms of configuration and troubleshooting and log management and monitoring as well. These are the edge points in addition to it being a modular solution where you can capitalize on your current licenses with extra licensing models, which can match the customer's business requirement and it can help the customer to design or to actually plan for their own roadmap."
"The solution appears to be stable, although we haven't used it heavily."
"It's easily scalable."
"We don't always know what the configurations are all about. They change the configuration possibilities all of the time and we don't always get the same results."
"If the price was lowered and the setup process was less complex, I would consider rating it higher."
"The initial setup was complex because some of the configurations that we required needed customization."
"In the future I would like to see simplified statistics and analytical threats."
"I'm not aware of any lacking features."
"There are occasional bugs."
"I would like improved downward integration with other tools such as McAfee and other GCP solutions."
"The solution is much more expensive than relative competitors like ArcSight or LogRhythm. It makes it hard to sell to customers sometimes."
"Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes."
More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Activity Monitoring while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 2nd in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 17 reviews. Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] is rated 6.0, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] writes "Good for IoT devices and occupation-calculations, but there are issues with stability and it is not user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Easy to configure and easy to use solution that integrates with many applications and scripts ". Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Identity, IBM Security QRadar, Cynet and Varonis Datalert.
We monitor all User Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.