We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Network Security and Singularity Cloud Workload Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud and Data Center Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its blades and VSLS (Virtual System Load Sharing) work fine."
"Auto-scaling and zero touch are valuable features."
"This solution brings us closer to having a better security score, which helps us a lot in complying with information regulations based on security."
"The program is very stable."
"The solution provides a centralized management console for easy administration and monitoring of security policies and events, making it easy for the security team."
"The feature most valuable to me is the NDTX blade that Check Point provides, and I like how the solution is not vulnerable."
"The visibility, the one-pane-of-glass which allows me to see all of my edge protection through one window and one log, is great. Monitoring everything through that one pane of glass is extremely valuable."
"It offers remarkable flexibility in how we configure and utilize the resources."
"The real-time detection and response capabilities overall are great."
"The visibility is the best part of the solution."
"I did a lot of research before signing up and doing the demo. They have a good reputation as far as catching threats early on."
"The ease of use of the platform is very nice."
"The management console is the most valuable feature."
"We really appreciate the Slack integration. When we have an incident, we get an instant notification. We also use Joe Sandbox, which Singularity can integrate with, so we can verify if a threat is legitimate."
"The management console is highly intuitive to comprehend and operate."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"Micro-Segmentation functionality for EAST-WEST traffic is not native and requires integration with a third-party OEM."
"Zero touch removes any independence for configuring."
"They are coming out with more SD-WAN express route support from a firewall perspective. That would be great."
"Its architecture and user interface need improvement. The user experience for this solution also needs to be improved, particularly in implementation, management, and operations."
"The solution's integration with cloud providers has seen significant development in the past months, but there is room for improvement for better integration."
"The costs are high."
"We are at the place where we are looking at better integration with the management system. We use an MDS today, and it is self-deployed. We want to get to the Smart-1 Cloud, but we do not know what that looks like today because it does not support a multi-domain setup. Smart-1 should either be able to do multi-domain or there should be some form of taking a multi-domain environment and putting it in Smart-1."
"We utilize logging systems, and geolocation is crucial for us as some applications must only be accessible from our country. However, there have been occasional issues with this feature."
"One of our use cases was setting up a firewall for our endpoints, specifically for our remote users... We were hoping to utilize SentinelOne's firewall capabilities, but there were limitations on how many URLs we could implement. Because of those limitations on the number of URLs, we weren't able to utilize that feature in the way we had hoped to."
"The cost has the potential for improvement."
"Currently, we would have to export our vulnerability report to an .xlsx file, and review it in an Excel spreadsheet, and then we sort of compile a list from there. It would be cool if there was a way to actually toggle multiple applications for review and then see those file paths on multiple users rather than only one user at a time or only one application at a time."
"Some of the navigation and some aspects of the portal may be a little bit confusing."
"While it is good, I think the solution's console could be improved."
"If I had to pick a complaint, it would be the way the hosts are listed in the tool. You have different columns separated by endpoint name, Cloud Account, and Cloud Instances ID. I wish there was something where we could change the endpoint name and not use just the IP address. We would like to have custom names or our own names for the instances. If I had a complaint, that would be it, but so far, it meets all the needs that we have."
"Their search feature could be better."
"It would be really helpful if the solution improves its agent deployment process."
More Check Point CloudGuard Network Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Singularity Cloud Workload Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is ranked 5th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 119 reviews while Singularity Cloud Workload Security is ranked 8th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 15 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is rated 8.6, while Singularity Cloud Workload Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security writes "The solution has good threat emulation, threat extraction, and reporting features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Singularity Cloud Workload Security writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is most compared with Azure Firewall, VMware NSX, Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Secure Firewall and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, whereas Singularity Cloud Workload Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Qualys VMDR, Illumio and Orca Security. See our Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Singularity Cloud Workload Security report.
See our list of best Cloud and Data Center Security vendors.
We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
