We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and GWAVA [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."The most valuable feature is the single dashboard that enables us to manage the entire cloud environment from one place."
"This platform has allowed us to collect data from multiple sources, centralizing everything under a single source."
"On Dome9, you can have reports on compliance, users created, and EAM access to the cloud infrastructure. For example, if some machine is exposed to the Internet, importing and exporting to the Internet when it shouldn't, we get immediate alerts if someone does this type of configuration by mistake. Dome9 is very important because AWS doesn't protect us for this. It is the client's responsibility to make sure that we don't export things to the Internet. This solution helps us ensure that we comply with our security measures."
"It learns from behavior, attacks, management, detections, captures packets, real-time analysis, et cetera. It's generating knowledge from a variety of sources for an excellent analysis."
"The CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence tool has several significant features that provide security to our company."
"We know the vulnerability in advance, so we can take some action for that vulnerability."
"The ability to integrate it with Microsoft Azure Sentinel allows us to validate the logs in an even more complex and meaningful way."
"It helps us to analyze vulnerabilities way before they get installed in production and the web. It gives us more security in the production environment."
"It's a perfect business pump filter. We have much less false positives, and also less spam than other organizations."
"I'd like to see more advanced encryption for local features, which is not present right now."
"The license cost is expensive and has room for improvement."
"The solution could be improved with a greater analysis of its Microsoft Security score."
"Streamlining the user interface would greatly improve the user experience."
"It should capture more information in metadata including communication detail. Also, Internal IP addresses should not be tracked as this might be having some compliance issues."
"The reporting dashboard responds slowly, which leads to late report compilation."
"The tool has a lot of potential, but today, it lacks a lot of Scripts/Bots for Azure."
"Automation and advanced threat prevention have room for improvement."
"The solution needs to be more user-friendly. I don't want to have to go to my IT guy and have him explain aspects of the solution to me. There should be a way for them to be able to translate aspects of the product to a typical user in a clear concise way."
Earn 20 points
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 6th in Vulnerability Management with 63 reviews while GWAVA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Vulnerability Management. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while GWAVA [EOL] is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GWAVA [EOL] writes "An excellent anti-spam solution for mail systems". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas GWAVA [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
