We performed a comparison between CA Risk Authentication [EOL] and Gemalto Protiva based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while Gemalto Protiva doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems. CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Gemalto Protiva is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Gemalto Protiva writes "Strong authentication permits our organization to improve security". CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Gemalto Protiva is most compared with .
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.