CA CEM [EOL] vs Mackerel comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Mackerel Logo
161 views|137 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA CEM [EOL] and Mackerel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
161
Comparisons
137
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CEM
Learn More
Mackerel
Video Not Available
Overview
CA Customer Experience Manager (CA CEM) is a product within the Application Performance Management solution that measures web application performance for each individual customer. CA CEM measures the performance and quality of customer transactions, identifies defects and variance, and quantifies the impact on customers and the business. CA CEM lets you monitor real user activities -- including login, account update, or purchase transactions -- at the business service level. By proactively detecting trends in degraded customer transaction response times and providing various actionable reports, CA CEM lets you act before problems occur or SLAs are out of compliance. These capabilities enable both your business managers and IT staff to understand and resolve performance problems before end users call for support.
Mackerel is an elegantly simple and powerful service that employs the concept of "roles" to optimize management and monitoring of hosts. By running mackerel-agent on your hosts, you can manage any number of hosts using both Mackerel's web GUI and API to visualize the statuses of your hosts and applications with a high degree of detail and customization.
Sample Customers
First Horizon National Corporation, Olympus, Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago LimitedŒ _Petrotrinî, Racing and Wagering Western Australia
M.T.Burn Inc., Nulab Inc., Nintendo, Livesense, Seesaa, Retty, Gyazo, Hatena, GMO, Kaizen Platform, Prott
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA CEM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Mackerel is ranked 75th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. CA CEM [EOL] is rated 6.0, while Mackerel is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA CEM [EOL] writes "It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance. We've had lots of hardware issues with the MPMs". On the other hand, CA CEM [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Mackerel is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.