AWS CodePipeline vs Inedo BuildMaster comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,776 views|3,717 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Inedo Logo
92 views|55 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Inedo BuildMaster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control.""The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration.""The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment.""AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing.""It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS.""The integration with other applications is fabulous.""The integrations are good.""The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."

More AWS CodePipeline Pros →

"Technical support is quick to respond. I haven't had any issues with them."

More Inedo BuildMaster Pros →

Cons
"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors.""The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation.""AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization.""There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base.""The product’s pricing needs improvement.""The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement.""The setup time is a bit long.""The support team’s response time must be improved."

More AWS CodePipeline Cons →

"The documentation should be better. It should be very easy to call REST APIs, and the documentation has to be perfect for that."

More Inedo BuildMaster Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "AWS offers free business or enterprise support services."
  • "It is a straightforward approach where you pay for the resources you consume as they offer a subscription-based licensing model."
  • "The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."
  • "AWS CodePipeline is quite affordable. I've been running around four pipelines and the cost is around one dollar per month. It rarely exceeds two dollars."
  • "Compared to other cloud services, AWS CodePipeline falls a bit more on the pricey side. I see that the price of the product has been increasing for the past few years."
  • More AWS CodePipeline Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web… more »
    Top Answer:The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions.
    Top Answer:Technical support is quick to respond. I haven't had any issues with them.
    Top Answer:The documentation should be better. It should be very easy to call REST APIs, and the documentation has to be perfect for that. The embedded tasks and approval process looks very basic in the older… more »
    Top Answer:We use this solution as a deployment agent to deploy out to various other servers. We're using version 6.1. We host the solution on our own server. There are about 100 people using this solution in my… more »
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    4,776
    Comparisons
    3,717
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    395
    Rating
    8.2
    21st
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    92
    Comparisons
    55
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    399
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CodePipeline
    BuildMaster
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

    BuildMaster lets you release your software reliably, to any environment, at whatever pace the business demands. Build a self-service release management platform by allowing different teams to manage their own applications and deploy to their own environments. BuildMaster allows you to start simple and then scale to thousands of servers and the cloud.

    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Rate Setter, Axian
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Transportation Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS CodePipeline is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 13 reviews while Inedo BuildMaster is ranked 21st in Build Automation with 1 review. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while Inedo BuildMaster is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inedo BuildMaster writes "Deployment agent that allows us to deploy out to various other servers but doesn't provide build automation". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas Inedo BuildMaster is most compared with .

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.