Arcserve OneXafe Solo vs StackPath Object Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Arcserve OneXafe Solo and StackPath Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage.
To learn more, read our detailed File and Object Storage Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
22nd
Views
76
Comparisons
60
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
20th
Views
127
Comparisons
84
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
File and Object Storage
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: March 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
StorageCraft OneBlox
Learn More
Overview

OneXafe Solo Backup Appliance for Total Business Continuity

The OneXafe Solo backup appliance is extremely easy to deploy and manage all within a few simple steps: plug it in, connect to the internet, and start protecting data in minutes. OneXafe Solo brings the same data protection technology that drives ShadowXafe in a compact backup appliance form factor.

Why use StackPath Object Storage?
Frequent (hot) storage shouldn’t cost a lot. And once you’re paying for storage, we don’t believe you should pay AGAIN to access it. Welcome to StackPath’s Object Storage.

Save Money
50% cheaper than Amazon S3 or similar cloud storage providers.

No Data Transfer Fees
No charges for data transfer (egress) or API requests/calls.

High Performance
Better performance than cloud storage providers, even more so once paired with StackPath’s CDN or Edge Computing.

Performance
StackPath’s system architecture enables an average 6x faster performance relative to Cloud Storage Providers*. Especially when paired with our CDN or Edge Compute, this performance advantage means significantly faster time-to-first-byte speeds.

S3-Compatible
100% AWS S3 bit-compatible (same AWS API constructs for storage & identity management). No need to change your S3-compatible application.

Superior TTFB
Average time-to-first-byte (TTFB) performance of less than 15 ms; made even faster when paired with our CDN. This is significantly lower than others’ TTFB.

Immediate Read Capability
When you write an object to our buckets, it can be read immediately after. This is not always the case with Amazon S3 — a well-known issue for AWS developers.

Sample Customers
Sonic, Amazon, Kawasaki, Callaway, Drake University, Mazda, Thales, California Highway Patrol, Guggenheim, Bruker, NASA, Oregon.gov
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
File and Object Storage
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: March 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Arcserve OneXafe Solo is ranked 22nd in File and Object Storage while StackPath Object Storage is ranked 20th in File and Object Storage. Arcserve OneXafe Solo is rated 0.0, while StackPath Object Storage is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Arcserve OneXafe Solo is most compared with , whereas StackPath Object Storage is most compared with .

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.