Arcad DROPS vs Automic Continuous Delivery Director comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Arcad DROPS and Automic Continuous Delivery Director based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There is a free trial available that people can try. The solution has a subscription and it is based on the users that use the solution."
  • More Automic Continuous Delivery Director Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Its extensive range of available connectors eliminates the need for manual code writing when implementing solutions, thus reducing coding efforts.
    Top Answer:The product has easy licensing, which depends on the number being installed.
    Top Answer:The product's development has been stopped. It focuses on maintaining existing products.
    Ranking
    31st
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    32
    Comparisons
    14
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    15th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    138
    Comparisons
    55
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    465
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    DROPS
    CA CDD, CA Continuous Delivery Director
    Learn More
    Overview

    DROPS offers a unique solution for the management and automation of application and systems software deployment across multiple platforms – including IBM i, Windows, UNIX, Linux, and System z.

    CA Continuous Delivery Director is a powerful pipeline planning, orchestration and analytics solution that enables teams to eliminate spreadsheets, automate test processes and continually improve the delivery of revenue-generating features to end customers. The solution works with the most popular commercial and open source DevOps solutions to orchestrate the pipeline from planning through production. It is also the core of the continuous delivery ecosystem from CA, which includes development, testing and deployment solutions. CA Continuous Delivery Director enables effortless continuous delivery of high-quality, innovative applications from high-performance, collaborative teams.

    Sample Customers
    Core Mark, bankinter, Bollore, Fidelity & Guaranty Life, Syartec, Banque Palatine
    United Airlines
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Arcad DROPS is ranked 31st in Release Automation while Automic Continuous Delivery Director is ranked 15th in Release Automation with 5 reviews. Arcad DROPS is rated 0.0, while Automic Continuous Delivery Director is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Automic Continuous Delivery Director writes "An automation solution to automate the entire release process but lacks development". Arcad DROPS is most compared with , whereas Automic Continuous Delivery Director is most compared with .

    See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.