• Home
  • AMS 2000 Family [EOL] vs. XIO Hyper ISE

AMS 2000 Family [EOL] vs XIO Hyper ISE comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AMS 2000 Family [EOL] and XIO Hyper ISE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
16th
out of 23 in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
Views
91
Comparisons
71
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Hyper ISE
Learn More
Hitachi Vantara
XIO
Video Not Available
Overview
The Hitachi Data Systems AMS 2000 storage system includes three array models:
  • AMS 2100 - Smaller system provides up to 120 disk drives ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2300 - Midrange system provides up to 240 disk drives. ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2500 - High-end system provides up to 480 disk drives, ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.

Hyper ISE creates a new class of storage system, focused on performance-driven applications. It is a true amalgamation of solid-state drive (SSD) and hard disk drive (HDD) technologies into a single pool of capacity.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Argus Information & Advisory Services, Microsoft, Capital Institutional Services, Pasco-Hernando Community College, Argent Group
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AMS 2000 Family [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while XIO Hyper ISE is ranked 16th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is rated 0.0, while XIO Hyper ISE is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is most compared with , whereas XIO Hyper ISE is most compared with .

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.