Alluvio AppResponse vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Riverbed Logo
828 views|601 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Riverbed Logo
views| comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alluvio AppResponse and Aternity AppInternals [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.""With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse.""When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,""It provides us with complete visibility of every packet.""Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data.""We really like the scalability capabilities.""AppResponse is a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility into applications at all levels, from Layer 1 to Layer 7. We can trace all those sections: physical, IP, transport, presentation, application, etc. It gives us the full picture.""The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."

More Alluvio AppResponse Pros →

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise.""Synthetic transactions, WMI and SNMP query capability.""The capability of analysing each individual transaction captured to a very low level detail (method call/line of code).""The product is very useful to find problems in middleware for the application servers, especially agent instrumentation and management is user friendly.""Transaction Tracing is the most useful. Being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable.""I like it that one can match IPs with the application name.""Browsermetrix, which is real-user monitoring via JS injection and linked back to TTW via cookie. It allows us to see the experience of every user hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc.""We just control on the backend of AppInternals what we want to instrument and what we don't want to instrument."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance.""The initial setup is straightforward, but you have to know a little about the product. It's not for everybody to just plug and play. If you know how the solution is implemented then it is straightforward.""The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal.""They need to better integrate with products and solutions from different vendors.""Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems.""Technical support needs to be more responsive.""Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse.""Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."

More Alluvio AppResponse Cons →

"I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it is now.""We have put in a request as an enhancement that we would like to search for items. If we're searching for a URL and we want to know was it a get or was it a post.""The admin dashboard could be easier as it takes a little bit of time to get used to it.""They should find a way for report generation from TTW to run quicker.""The recording mechanism for synthetic transactions could be improved as well.""Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update.""We'd like to be able to find out performance problems on application class and methods.""It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
  • "The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."
  • "The solution is no more expensive than other products."
  • "It is costly for small and medium businesses."
  • More Alluvio AppResponse Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
  • "The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."
  • More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.
    Top Answer:AppResponse is a little expensive, but the cost depends on your configuration and storage. It was about $200,000 for three years.
    Top Answer:Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems. Alluvio AppResponse should include the ability to monitor Linux servers.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    828
    Comparisons
    601
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    326
    Rating
    9.0
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
    SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert
    Learn More
    Riverbed
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

    Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

    Sample Customers
    N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
    National Instruments, Allianz
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Healthcare Company13%
    Transportation Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider29%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Government14%
    Media Company14%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Alluvio AppResponse is ranked 37th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 15 reviews while Aternity AppInternals [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Alluvio AppResponse is rated 8.8, while Aternity AppInternals [EOL] is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Alluvio AppResponse writes "It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aternity AppInternals [EOL] writes "We use it to see the experience of users hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc". Alluvio AppResponse is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, ThousandEyes, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Cisco Secure Network Analytics, whereas Aternity AppInternals [EOL] is most compared with IDERA Precise.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.