My customers use it to replace the mainframe of each system that's difficult to provide in a test environment. We use virtualization or intelligent mockup.
It is easy to use. This is what I tell my customers. The coding is easier to develop as well.
The monitoring feature is not impressive because they use Windows for so much monitoring. They set a lock on the window, and then we have to gather the information from the main monitoring feature in the Windows server. There is not enough capacity for problem solving performance issues.
I've worked with this solution for six years.
Right now, the best platform for Micro Focus Service Virtualization is the Windows environment. Windows is somewhat less stable than Linux, and because Windows is not as stable, the maximum stability you can have with Micro Focus Service Virtualization is 70%.
The support for Micro Focus Service Virtualization is better than that for other products. The technical support staff are highly skilled. Sometimes, we don't have to open a ticket. We can just go into the community and then talk to them directly. I would rate technical support at seven out of ten.
The initial setup is not complex, and it is easy to maintain.
It's an expensive solution, but you can get discounts. You have to buy one server and one designer together, for example, and it may cost 15 million Thai Baht.
Because of the price, Micro Focus Service Virtualization is not for everyone. For large companies with specific use cases, this solution may be the best way to go.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate this solution at seven.
