Share your experience using LANCOM R&S Unified Firewalls

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 84,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

System Admin at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
Real User
Offers good anti-spam and web filtering features but needs to improve in the area of scalability
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of the solution stem from web filtering, malware protection, and antivirus."
  • "The product has some scalability and data management issues where improvements are required."

What is our primary use case?

I use the solution in my company for blocking websites and malware filtering.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of the solution stem from web filtering, malware protection, and antivirus.

What needs improvement?

If you have very secure data, Zyxel Unified Security Gateway will not be very useful. My company doesn't have to deal with secured data right now, so the tool is enough for us currently.

The product has some scalability and data management issues where improvements are required.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Zyxel Unified Security Gateway for two and a half years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable solution. For the past two and a half years, I haven't faced any issues with the product's stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is not a scalable solution, which is a major reason why my company is considering updating the tool to its latest version.

Right now, in terms of the use of the solution in my company, there has been a rise from 1,500 users to 3,000 concurrent users.

How are customer service and support?

The vendor provides technical support for the product. In my company, we have a technical team of three members who decide how to resolve an issue. I rate the technical support a seven out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

The product's deployment phase is usually managed by my company, and sometimes we seek help from the vendor.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

With the network part ready, the solution can be deployed in an hour and a half.

What was our ROI?

It is a cost-effective product in the market. Compared to the other firewall solutions in the market, Zyxel Unified Security Gateway is a cheaply priced product.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of Zyxel Unified Security Gateway is good compared to other similar products in the market.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

An increase in the number of users is a reason why my company decided to evaluate other options in the market against Zyxel Unified Security Gateway.

What other advice do I have?

The product's most beneficial feature is its ability to adapt to and deal with all malware attacks.

The intrusion detection capabilities I need are present in the solution. The tool has impacted the security posture in our organization since it has antivirus, anti-spam, web filters, security and quality control. The enhancement in the security posture has been beneficial for my company.

Integrating Zyxel Unified Security Gateway with our company's existing network infrastructure has been good as it works fine and I haven't seen any issues in it till now.

The vendor takes care of the maintenance part of the solution.

I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. 

I rate the tool a six out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
Senior System Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Outstanding support, reasonable price, and enables our staff to securely work from home
Pros and Cons
  • "The endpoint VPN is super stable. The routing is also very good. We tried a competing product first, but we could not make it work. We came across CloudGuard. The network routing across different virtual networks in Azure and AWS was way ahead of any of the other technologies. That helped us be able to cover the whole network using one single cluster."
  • "They are coming out with more SD-WAN express route support from a firewall perspective. That would be great."

What is our primary use case?

We had the firewalls set up in the cloud systems. We were using them for VPN as well as the encryption of traffic coming in and leaving the cloud.

When COVID-19 hit and everybody started to work from home, we did not have a scalable VPN technology. Also, with more people working from home, security was a bigger concern. CloudGuard Network Security addressed both needs in one single product.

How has it helped my organization?

After implementing CloudGuard Network Security, overnight, 500 people could work from home on a secure and encrypted tunnel. What more could we ask for? When COVID-19 hit and everything closed down, we were able to spin this up within 2 weeks.

CloudGuard Network Security provides us with unified security management across hybrid clouds as well as on-prem. There is a single admin client that you can use. You can have a firewall deployed on-prem. You can have a firewall deployed in GCP. You can have a firewall deployed in AWS or Microsoft Azure, but you can manage it all with a single pane of glass. You can have a single management station managing all of these.

We are very confident about it and our security. It is a very robust solution.

What is most valuable?

The endpoint VPN is super stable. The routing is also very good. We tried a competing product first, but we could not make it work. We came across CloudGuard. The network routing across different virtual networks in Azure and AWS was way ahead of any of the other technologies. That helped us be able to cover the whole network using one single cluster.

What needs improvement?

They have come such a long way. There may be other areas that other people use, but as far as I am concerned, I have been very happy with it. There are always newer features getting added and new encryption protocols coming. I can see where they are going and how far they have come. I have been using the Check Point firewall since 2010. It has been 14 years, and I have seen how they have improved.

They are coming out with more SD-WAN express route support from a firewall perspective. That would be great. They keep on launching new features. That is how they work.

For how long have I used the solution?

I was one of the first sites to use it as a PoC before they even introduced it to the world. It has been 4 or 5 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability. It has been running since we put it up.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability. It depends on your design. You can either have a static deployment where there is only one firewall, two firewalls, and four firewalls, or you can put it in the elastic mode where it will spin up as the load goes up. It will auto-scale up and auto-scale down. It is fantastic.

How are customer service and support?

They are fantastic. Their technical support is absolutely great. There is ownership right from the top down. They know their product. They stand by their product. If there is a feature that is not working, I have seen them write patches for me in 48 hours. They offered to provide the patch by Sunday evening in Tel Aviv, and by Sunday afternoon, I had an email saying that the patch was available for our download. We could download it and reinstall it. That patch was only written because of something in my deployment. It was not like they had 200 customers who complained about it. I was the only one complaining about it.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

We did a PoC for one week. We had some major issues because of sizing. We sized CloudGuard too small, so we made it bigger. The next week, we did another PoC, and it worked well. By the third week, we were done. We went live, and everybody was working from home. 

I would rate it an eight out of ten in terms of ease of installation.

Their support was good. We set it up when nobody else in the world had seen it. We were probably the third company in the whole world to roll it out. We were that new to it. Nowadays, I would rate their support an eight out of ten, but in those days, it was one out of ten because we were all learning together.

What about the implementation team?

I was the only one involved in its deployment. To deploy this, you need to have a background in IT security and networking put together.

What was our ROI?

We have seen an ROI. 500 people were able to work from home. That itself is a huge ROI.

It is one of the top solutions in the world. We know that it is protecting our entire cloud infrastructure, so it makes a lot of sense.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I quite like the way they priced it. It is very reasonable.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did evaluate other solutions. We looked at Fortinet, and they could not do cross-VNet traffic at that time. We spent almost five or six days. We worked 10 to 12 hours a day. Even after 60 to 70 hours, they could not make it work, but it worked out-of-the-box with CloudGuard Network Security. In terms of ease of use, CloudGuard Network Security is any day easier.

We did not just go with our cloud vendor's cloud firewall because the cloud vendor did not have a firewall at that time. Secondly, even if they did, it is always good to have a third-party product protecting the cloud. If we are using AWS, I would not put an AWS firewall there because if there is a compromise somewhere else, it is most likely going to carry over to their firewall too because everything runs on the same fabric, whereas this is separate. It gives a completely independent security front end.

What other advice do I have?

I would definitely recommend it. I have used it. I know how it works.

Check Point has been one of the pioneers of firewall technology. This is the only product that they really do. They are into cybersecurity firewall technology. They are not like other competitors, such as Cisco or Fortinet, who also have network switches, hubs, routers, etc. Check Point is a dedicated company that does cybersecurity. All in all, this is what they do. You can see the investment coming from the top down. They have ownership of the product. I have raised complaints that have gone up to Gil Shwed. He is the CEO and the founder of Check Point. I have got an email from Gil saying that he knows we are frustrated, but they are working on it, and he will make sure that this gets fixed. That is the kind of ownership they have.

Overall, I would rate CloudGuard Network Security a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate