Share your experience using Amazon FSx

We use the tool for authentication across all customers and save data. It also helps us to monitor servers. 

The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring downtime, which is a strong point. Based on the money spent, we can get performance improvements and high availability. 

Azure NetApp Files is expensive. 

I have been working with the product for eight years. 

I rate Azure NetApp Files' stability an eight out of ten. 

The tool is scalable. They offer three different sizes for backup purposes, and if a disk is available, you can retrieve data from it immediately.

I have only experienced the best performance from Azure NetApp Files and have never faced any performance issues with the product. 

Before choosing Azure NetApp Files, I used a different setup to mount a single disk and share it across multiple servers. This approach often led to connectivity issues and network glitches, especially when there were problems with the network switches.

Azure NetApp Files' deployment is easy. 

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. Customers want high availability without interruptions. If you're looking for a reliable service where your environment stays stable and accessible at all times, I'd recommend going with Azure NetApp Files. From my experience of several migrations, I've found it to be a dependable solution that ensures continuous availability without interruptions.

We use the tool to aggregate all our information into one particular environment. We have separate environments, but we aggregate the important pieces into one environment so they can be used for reporting and analytics.

Azure Data Lake Storage is a user-friendly and easy-to-learn solution.

The solution's instructions could be improved. Some terminology is not easy to understand when using some interfaces. Microsoft must provide more examples because everybody uses the tool differently.

I have been using Azure Data Lake Storage for 5 years.

I rate the solution’s stability ten out of ten.

Around 300 users use the solution in our organization, including developers and people who use the data through report interfaces.

I rate the solution ten out of ten for scalability.

The solution’s initial setup was straightforward.

We implemented the solution through an in-house team. Certain features are turned on to deploy the tool. You go in there and set up what you need, like the database or data factory. Once they turn it on and give you permission, you go in there and set it up yourself.

The tool is worth the money because I've worked in other environments, and this one seems to be the most flexible and easy to use.

I use Azure Data Lake Storage version 2. We integrate the solution with other internal and external sources through REST and SQL. We have external sites that we integrate or pull the information into. We can see all the data in one place and report off of it.

The tool can be expanded at a moment's notice. Once I'm done, I can lower the threshold back down. The solution's flexibility allows me to increase my CPU or database size at a moment's notice.

Overall, I rate the solution 10 out of 10.