We use it for activity monitoring and vulnerability assessments.
The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
We use it for activity monitoring and vulnerability assessments.
The features I like are the robust policies, which allow us to create customized monitoring based on specific activities.
Also, the dynamic encryption and masking functionality is interesting. And the vulnerability assessment feature is comprehensive; we can scan for specific vulnerabilities.
The main issue I have with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is the support. It's not good. They're slow, and they don't seem to resolve issues effectively. We have an ongoing problem that they haven't been able to fix.
We had an issue with the setup that we've been trying to resolve. The reports are not coming out the way I want them to.
I'm not enjoying the support. They don't always resolve issues, and sometimes logged cases seem to disappear. The support is not good for me. They should resolve issues as they're escalated.
It's stable. However, it does require a lot of resources.
I would rate the stability a six out of ten.
The solution itself is straightforward. The implementation was fine.
We set up the central manager, the archive, agents on the database servers, and S-TAPs on the collectors. Then, we configured policies and reports.
I would recommend using it. It is good for database protection.
The product itself is good, but the support is lacking. I'd rate it a seven out of ten.
Oracle Audit Vault has improved our compliance reporting.
Oracle Audit Vault has a lot of great features, but what I find most valuable is the database firewall. The assessment reports in version 19.10 are also incredibly useful for conducting security assessments and ensuring compliance with regulations.
The performance of Oracle Audit Vault could be improved, especially in handling large data collections and generating reports on time. Additionally, the efficiency of queries for retrieving information from the database needs improvement, particularly in large-scale environments.
I have been using Oracle Audit Vault for ten years.
There is a connection between performance and stability, especially when handling large data volumes in Oracle Audit Vault. Stability issues may arise during heavy data collection. I would rate the stability of the solution as a six out of ten.
I would rate the scalability of Oracle Audit Vault as a six out of ten. My clients who use the solution are mostly enterprise businesses.
I have found Oracle's technical support to be quite bad. Despite opening numerous tickets, I often haven't received solid solutions. Most of the time, I end up resolving issues internally without much help from Oracle support. I would rate the support as a one out of ten.
Negative
Comparing Oracle to IBM Guardium, I find Oracle to be better in certain features, although IBM Guardium may offer more stability. Overall, I would recommend Oracle Audit Vault over IBM Guardium due to its more comprehensive and digitalized solution.
The implementation time for Oracle Audit Vault varies based on customer needs and requirements. Typically, it can take a minimum of two weeks, but the process may extend up to six months or longer, depending on customization and additional features requested by the customer, such as integration with SysLog or other servers.
I would rate the costliness of Oracle Audit Vault as a seven out of ten. It is a bit expensive.
I would recommend Oracle Audit Vault to others. Overall, I would rate it as a six out of ten.
