I use the solution for application virtualization. We have deployed the tool in multiple locations.
The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
I use the solution for application virtualization. We have deployed the tool in multiple locations.
The solution is easy to manage. It can be deployed easily. The product has improved our operational cost and efficiency.
Customization must be improved. The tool must provide more freedom to the customer.
I have been using the solution for 5 years.
I rate the product’s stability a 9 out of 10.
The product’s scalability feature has supported our growth well. We have different numbers of users on different sites. We have around 200 users. I rate the scalability a 9 out of 10.
The customer support is fine.
Positive
We have used physical servers before. We switched to Microsoft Virtual Server due to its cost and ease of management.
The initial deployment was complex. Now, it is straightforward. I rate the ease of setup an eight out of ten. The deployment can be done in days. The time taken for deployment depends on the infrastructure.
Microsoft Virtual Server is a low-cost solution.
I will recommend the tool to others. My advice depends on the infrastructure someone is using. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
I wasn't able to work on SQLite using the desktop version, so I needed to update my assignment. I feel like Microsoft Virtual Server is a better, more convenient choice.
It is easy to use. It offers good compatibility with other operating systems. That's one of the reasons I used it. I am a Mac user.
Sometimes, it can cause a lag. It depends on the operating system and the working machine. If your machine is good and has a fast processing time, then maybe you can work on the desktop version easily.
Otherwise, you might find some challenges working on the desktop version because it causes lag.
Even I was using it on my Mac, so it was lagging a bit. I got some references, and then it stopped lagging after that. They asked me to work on a loop, and then it started working on the saving.
Microsoft Virtual Server could be easier to use. Otherwise, it's a good substitute for other virtualization options.
I would rate the stability a six out of ten. So, it can be improved.
I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten.
In my university, if people have a Windows operating system, then they might not have a server or anything. They already have everything.
The reason I chose Microsoft Virtual Server was because I had to use some Windows tools. I was working. Actually, I just had to use some Windows tools from the university for IT.
The setup process was straightforward. It took a couple of minutes to set up.
I had to install an application for that. Then maybe it asked for some credentials.
I deployed it myself.
For me, I have been provided everything from the university.
Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. If you have a Windows operating system or if you can find a substitute, then you can go for the substitute.
