We have more than 100 teams in our organization using GitHub because it is a centralized repository tool. We have many interdependent applications, and GitHub provides a platform where people can share their codes in a particular directory.
The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
We have more than 100 teams in our organization using GitHub because it is a centralized repository tool. We have many interdependent applications, and GitHub provides a platform where people can share their codes in a particular directory.
GitHub's merging feature is much better than that of other products because merging is done daily. The solution's centralized administration is also very good, allowing you to onboard more than 200 or 1,000 people daily.
The solution's cost is high and should be reduced. Our company has a bundle product. Sometimes, people from outside our organization also need to collaborate with our code, and we need to integrate them as well. This causes problems for us because we also need to buy a subscription for them.
I have been using GitHub for two years.
I rate the solution an eight out of ten for stability.
I rate GitHub’s scalability a nine out of ten.
The solution’s technical support is very good.
The solution’s initial setup is easy.
We took help from GitHub's support team to deploy the solution. The initial setup is not very big, but onboarding people takes time. My company has more than 20,000 users. The solution's initial setup takes around one or two days.
We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution. If you buy extra support, you pay an additional cost.
The solution's deployment and maintenance is very straightforward. It does not take many people to deploy the solution. The planning part is very important. If you are planning for a big team, you have to plan very well. Planning the initial architecture is very important, and it can be done by an architecture team of one to five people. GitHub is far better than other products because it has a very good backend team.
Since we use a cloud version, it helps support our team's collaboration across different locations. An organization that has a lot of documentation should utilize GitHub. Otherwise, they will lose their data. GitHub is the main product in any software development organization. AI is only for data, but processing the data from AI needs to be stored somewhere. AI requires collaborating with other tools like GitHub, a repository tool.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
We used the product for CI/CD.
I like the CI/CD features. The tool was easy for me to use because I had used it for a long time. GitHub is a leader in the domain. Others copy GitHub.
The stability can be improved.
I have used the solution for 15 years.
I rate the tool’s stability a ten out of ten. The vendor modifies many things and provides new releases regularly.
The tool is very scalable and reliable. There is no loss in quality.
It is easy to set up the account and give permissions to others.
The product can be deployed in-house.
The product is reasonably priced.
I have also used GitLab. There is not much difference between GitLab and GitHub.
I used GitHub in my previous organization. In my current organization, we mostly use Azure. GitHub is easy to use and easy to manage. It's good for integration and for multi-worker projects. It is robust. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
