Our primary use case for the solution is for end vision monitoring with an endpoint solution. We also use them to create network status while focusing on the synthetic solution because of digital monitoring. Catchpoint provides a great amount of information, and customers want budgets, so they spend less on cheaper products. Catchpoint has a better chance to increase its market, but they have been focusing on the synthetic force because there is a clear advantage and digital monitoring. We deploy the solution on-premises.
Catchpoint tries to cover the full stack of other computers. However, it is not a good idea because many computers can check the complete spec monitoring, like Datadog, New Relic and Dynatrace. Hence, Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring.
Additionally, for the old process, we provided a base point that is not cheap compared to a more affordable version like pin down. So further improvements can be made by assessing their strategy and improving brand marketing for the latest version of Catchpoint because many customers are unaware of it.
We have been using Catchpoint for over four years.
I rate the stability a nine out of ten.
I rate the scalability an eight out of ten.
We get customer service and support from our vendors.
We implement it with a vendor team.
I rate the price a two out of ten, where one is a high price and ten is a low price.
I rate the solution a six out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring and improving its marketing strategy to strengthen consumer awareness of the solution.
