Share your experience using Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL]

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 84,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

ReubenWazwa - PeerSpot reviewer
Radio Frequency Engineer | Wireless Solutions Designer at Optace Networks
Reseller
Top 10
Reliable and offers fair pricing
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller."
  • "One drawback is that Cambium's on-premises controller needs internet connectivity for installation, which can be a problem for clients who want it offline."

What is our primary use case?

My clients mainly use Cambium for distributing their wireless Internet capacity to homes, businesses, and public hotspots.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller, allowing management of all equipment from one login.

What needs improvement?

One drawback is that Cambium's on-premises controller needs internet connectivity for installation, which can be a problem for clients who want it offline. Also, configuring Cambium solutions requires more expertise compared to some other vendors.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Cambium Networks Wireless WAN for three months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my experience over the past three months, I haven't encountered any serious stability issues or glitches with the product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I find the product to be scalable. You can start with a basic setup and expand as needed. Adding features or licenses is straightforward, and the availability of a free controller is a bonus. Overall, it is very scalable.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Ruckus offers more automation compared to Cambium, but Cambium requires less expertise and offers competitive pricing.

How was the initial setup?

Deploying Cambium solutions requires some knowledge and understanding of the concepts involved. It is not as easy as just unpacking and installing. With training or prior experience, it becomes manageable. Once set up, automation can make deployment quick, potentially taking only minutes for each device. Overall, it is a straightforward process that typically requires only one person.

What was our ROI?

The ROI for clients, especially for those running public hotspots, is quick, typically around three months due to the revenue generated. Time saved is significant, with automation reducing workload by about 70%.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing of Cambium is reasonable.

What other advice do I have?

Cambium's reliability ensures minimal connectivity issues for clients, even in challenging conditions like rain. Once set up, Wi-Fi access points and point-to-point links rarely experience downtime except for occasional part failures. 

Before using Cambium, I recommend doing some training or research on the product, as it will help you make the most of its features. Utilizing their portal for learning can also be beneficial.

Overall, I would rate Cambium Networks Wireless WAN as a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Flag as inappropriate
OğuzKalaycı - PeerSpot reviewer
System engineer at Yaşar Holding
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Easy to manage and enables users to connect to the network easily
Pros and Cons
  • "The tool is easy to manage."
  • "The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution to connect to networks.

What is most valuable?

The solution enables us to connect to the wireless network easily. We do not have any problems. It's a very good product. The tool is easy to manage.

What needs improvement?

The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for ten years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is very stable. We did not face any issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product is scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have about 300 to 400 users in our organization. We use the tool regularly.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is straightforward.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I rate the pricing a seven out of ten. The price is very good. There are no additional costs associated with the tool.

What other advice do I have?

I will recommend the solution to others. It is a valuable device. We use it for our daily operations. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate