We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle Integration Cloud Service (OIC) based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Mule Anypoint slightly nudges ahead of Oracle Integration Platform in this comparison, as Mule Anypoint offers very good API management. Users can easily define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them as desired. OIC’s payload and file polling limitations are some of the features that prevent the solution from being more competitive in the marketplace.
"The product is very user-friendly."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"The platform's cloud integration capabilities are good."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service integrates well and is user-friendly. If you are not a developer or ops engineer you can still use the solution with ease. You do not need to have developers' knowledge, you can easily adapt and learn quickly to integrate the services. They have good documentation."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its performance."
"The out-of-box integration between Oracle and SAP is really beneficial"
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"It's easy to build an integration and make changes to it."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service is a really good product and the ROI is very good with it. It lowers development time. A development cycle that may have taken a year without Oracle Integration Cloud Service can drop down to three or four months with it."
"The OIC is very good."
"It should give better control over account management."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"We would love to have more and more ready-to-use interfaces from Oracle."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"There are a few features that we noticed are not in the cloud. There are some improvements needed. One example is the graphical user interface that needs to improve, it could be easier to use."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
"There is a payload size limit and we're unable to integrate some legacy applications."
"The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 41 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate, Azure Data Factory and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.