We performed a comparison between Parallels Access and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Parallels Access has flexible licensing policies, which is beneficial for customers who have intermittent usage or users who are on and off the system."
"We don't have problems with stability. Everything is good."
"Parallels Access gives me full access and control of the computer, and I can do anything I want remotely."
"It's great that the total deployment can happen completely remotely."
"It's got a very easy-to-use interface."
"This solution is straightforward to use."
"TeamViewer is useful for accessing data and systems remotely. Using this application, I can access other computers using an ID number that I provide to the users whose laptop I would like to access."
"It is fairly feature-rich and stable."
"I recommend it as a solution for remote disk users."
"The most valuable features of TeamViewer are the high performance and it is not complicated to use, neither for me nor for the one I'm helping."
"The document control is quite good."
"It's very easy to set up."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is its ease of use."
"The solution may not scale well for enterprises."
"They could improve the reporting."
"When you want to transfer a file from your iPad or remote device to the computer, the copy-and-paste feature doesn't always work."
"One challenge we do notice is that the application is limited to Windows servers only. If a customer has a Linux server, things get complicated. They should open it up a bit to be more compatible with different types of servers."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing policy. The price point is pretty aggressive."
"Sometimes we'll have a device in the field, and I'll click on remote control and it says "Can't authenticate." I'll double click in a different part of the TeamViewer interface and it'll say "Can't authenticate." Then I'll do it a third time and it connects. It's possible that it's just bad luck. It's also very possible that it's some bug within TeamViewer..."
"TeamViewer could improve by having support for other operating systems, such as Linux."
"It needs to have proper authentication. I would like to see in-depth integration with Google and Microsoft products, for example. It would be nice to have a cell phone version as well."
"I am not sure about all the features of TeamViewer, but if they have no voice communication or file transfer features they should add them."
"Sometimes, the app can be a little cumbersome when accessing certain aspects of the program."
"I would like it if the trial version of TeamViewer allowed you to have a connection for much longer."
"They could give more information about using certain kinds of applications for secure transactions, such as secure file transfers."
"I can use up to three computers, but sometimes I have four. So, it would be nice to have at least four computers."
Parallels Access is ranked 12th in Remote Access with 5 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews. Parallels Access is rated 8.8, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Parallels Access writes "Allows users to access and operate their computers remotely". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". Parallels Access is most compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Splashtop Remote Support, VNC Connect, LogMeIn Pro and TeamViewer Tensor, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, ISL Online, BeyondTrust Remote Support and Webex. See our Parallels Access vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.