We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud API and App Integration and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The application integration will give you more flexibility when dealing with APIs."
"The interface is really good."
"The interface has a great look and feel, and the functionality is so easy."
"The OAuth feature is the most valuable feature for authentication."
"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"The setup is complex."
"There's no direct way to connect to Amazon APIs from Informatica Cloud."
"The pricing model is problematic."
"There could be a lot more application integration."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is ranked 11th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 4 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 41 reviews. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is rated 8.6, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud API and App Integration writes " Provides data governance and offer good scalability, with a significant performance boost when moving from on-prem to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Appian, ARIS Cloud and Microsoft Azure API Management, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Informatica Cloud API and App Integration vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.