We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the single pane of glass management and reliability."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is fast and does the job."
"It is easy to manage and configure. The dashboard of Meraki is easy to use."
"Meraki is a decent solution for a small company, and we use it in a pretty typical way. We need Teams and Zoom to work, and we need a high level of security because we want our business to remain confidential."
"Integrating with the router, firewall, and Wireless Controller is advantageous."
"The monitoring device enables you to see the network health."
"The most valuable feature is the stability. It works and doesn't stop."
"It is very stable, very resilient, and very robust."
"The stability of the solution has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"The most important feature is ease of use. We can simply take an access point and plug it in, then it is automatically configured for us."
"The cloud-based architecture of the controller is valuable because it obviously saves on my hardware costs."
"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"We have found Mojo to be critical for us because of its patented security and its wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS). It is unique in the market."
"The solution is very stable."
"It's scalable. You don't have to configure an access point. Literally, if I needed a new one, I just take it right out of the box, go plug it into our network. It finds our Mojo network, and then it talks to the other access points that are close to it, and then it literally adopts the policies, and meshes itself in our network."
"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"The signal coverage radius could be extended."
"The solution cannot be looked upon for one year or short term because you will pay back all the discounts they offer the next time you pay for renewal."
"The price could be slightly better, but then again, we negotiate deals every time so the market price isn't really relevant."
"In the future, I would like to see IP telephony in Saudi Arabia."
"Overall the solution needs to have more time to mature."
"The annual maintenance is something that needs to be changed."
"It would be nice to have licensing that stays in place while the system is being renovated or changed."
"Meraki leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to the technical capabilities in terms of throughput, spectrum, management, higher-level functions, etc"
"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""
"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."
"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."
"The setup was complex."
"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."
"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."
"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."
"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 20th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Mojo Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud and Cisco Wireless, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Mist AI and Cloud, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
