We performed a comparison between Aruba Wireless and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"The simplicity is great."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"APs are very easy to configure to the network once they contact the controller."
"Our wireless overhaul has reduced the number of wireless related help desk tickets by nearly 90%."
"The access points support a high number of connected clients."
"Aruba Wireless is easily scaled between a lot of devices and a lot of endpoints. When we decided to use it as our solution, we had planned to use it exactly for its ability to scale."
"Enterprise wireless LAN solution with good visibility and amazing scalability. Aruba Wireless also offers good technical support."
"AirWave is a valuable feature."
"It helps the user to have a better vision of what is happening in their network."
"The fact that Aruba Wireless has a virtual controller onboard the internet access points makes it cheaper than other solutions."
"The stability of the solution has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"The security is a valuable feature."
"The most important feature is ease of use. We can simply take an access point and plug it in, then it is automatically configured for us."
"Security is top-notch with WIPS (Wireless Intrusion Prevention System)."
"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."
"The initial setup was easy."
"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."
"Built-in guest analytics and advanced guest portal features allow our customers to create a guest experience which is typically only available with complex and expensive third-party software."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"They could work on energy consumption as this equipment needs a lot of energy."
"The initial setup is more complex than other solutions."
"The logging is hard to read when troubleshooting issues."
"For a more senior tool, a local application monitoring related to IoT vendors would be useful."
"Aruba Wireless has room to improve the connection from one AP to another."
"The bad things about the product are the price, the information about the product, and the time it takes to deliver the product."
"Better integration with equipment from other vendors would ease the deployment process in some cases."
"Aruba is missing some features that are available in other solutions, such as the email notifications. It's a bit complex to configure the notification part. Mainly I'm talking about the rogue WiFi detection. This email notification is crucial for us, but it isn't possible to configure with the built-in software. You need something else, like an external system log collector or another Aruba software. These notifications are essential in hospitality for PCI compliance. My colleagues in famous luxury hotel chains need that report."
"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."
"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."
"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."
"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."
"The setup was complex."
"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."
"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."
"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless LAN with 138 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 20th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews. Aruba Wireless is rated 8.4, while Mojo Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Wireless writes "The portal for centralized management and virtual controller for APs are very valuable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". Aruba Wireless is most compared with Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and Huawei Wireless, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Mist AI and Cloud, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Cisco Wireless. See our Aruba Wireless vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
