We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless LAN and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"The simplicity is great."
"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is easy to deploy. The implementation can take two weeks to four months."
"The after-sales services are helpful."
"It is a stable and secure platform."
"The web-based administration is what I find most beneficial."
"It provides good support remotely, and it's very easy to configure."
"This solution is extremely user-friendly; it is very easy to configure and work with."
"We can scale it if we need to."
"They all have controllers built in, and we manage them all with a web-based management tool."
"I can control any number of sites globally with a lean IT team."
"The product is super stable. I would rate the stability a ten."
"The product's cloud controller is easy to use."
"The product's cloud availability feature is the most valuable for network management."
"Multiple access ID capabilities, meshing, and the quality of the product itself are all valuable features."
"Its flexibility, ease of management via the portal, and the variety of access points are the most valuable features."
"The solution is very stable. It is a very manageable and secure system."
"The primary value lies in the ease of configuration; these products seamlessly integrate, and work well together."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The price could be better."
"I believe there's room for improvement in the configuration options for point-to-point setups directly from the cloud management interface. Currently, the process feels a bit clunky—you monitor the unit in the cloud but need to make configuration changes by editing a text file, then downloading it back to the unit. This method can be error-prone, as even a small mistake in the text file could disrupt the unit's configuration."
"If they could include some sort of web filtering, in-built antivirus, anti-malware, and data stream scanning in the next release."
"The capacity and coverage could be improved."
"The solution’s technical support could be faster."
"The problem with this radio wireless technology is that it cannot compete in terms of bandwidth with the fiber optics at this moment. That's the biggest weakness."
"We would like this product to have more information data sheets available. At present we cannot easily access details around the full capability of a piece of equipment."
"The product pricing needs improvement."
"The solution should be scalable, offering better pricing options as we optimize the network for coverage, capacity, and quality"
"In a future release, they should offer a next-generation UTM, where you can manage all items and the network, and have it include a lot of security features like fingerprinting functionality."
"The wireless infrastructure scalability has room for improvement."
"Licensing is, in my opinion, the least appealing component. It can be difficult to keep licenses up to date in order for the system to function properly."
"The price could be slightly better, but then again, we negotiate deals every time so the market price isn't really relevant."
"It is super expensive for what you get. I just wish it was less expensive."
"Our only concern at this stage is how it's licensed."
"The price could be slightly lowered to make it more competitive in the market."
"Meraki is still very much a small office type of solution. It is not a fit for large enterprise networks, as it doesn't have tunneling functionalities."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is ranked 14th in Wireless LAN with 14 reviews while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN writes "Easy to configure; one of the cheapest solutions in the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Instant On Access Points, Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Instant, Aruba Wireless and ExtremeWireless, whereas Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud and ExtremeWireless. See our Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
