We performed a comparison between Aruba Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless LAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The simplicity is great."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"Stability and its ability to handle more devices has been an improvement for our organization."
"The network strength is good."
"We were able to increase capacity very easily."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Wireless is multi-tenancy."
"It has an aesthetically pleasing GUI for configuration."
"Aruba Central."
"Enterprise wireless LAN solution with good visibility and amazing scalability. Aruba Wireless also offers good technical support."
"The virtual controller has options for updating and remotely restarting any AP from one controller panel."
"What I like best about Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is that it's easy to configure, has no licensing hassle, and is a controller-based solution."
"It offers features that are essential for an efficient and high-performance wireless LAN deployment, where capacity, coverage, and quality are optimized, and frequency bands are selected based on the specific needs of the network."
"It is a stable and secure platform."
"It provides good support remotely, and it's very easy to configure."
"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is easy to deploy. The implementation can take two weeks to four months."
"The product has valuable throughput capabilities. It also has an inbuilt spectrum analyzer for stable connectivity."
"This solution is extremely user-friendly; it is very easy to configure and work with."
"The product is user-friendly and helps with cost minimization."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"The price could be better."
"Aruba needs to be more competitive with newer products. Their legacy makes that more difficult for them."
"We need security features to recognize the traffic source and to apply Zero Trust security."
"Better integration with equipment from other vendors would ease the deployment process in some cases."
"Aruba Wireless can improve the assigning of access points. We have times that the nearest access point is not assigned but one far away. The integration between access points could improve."
"To enhance the system, more work on integration would be beneficial."
"There were some settings which were confusing and unlabeled when trying to use the online help with the newer firmware."
"Configuration could be made easier with more bandwidth than they offer at the moment."
"Configuration for this solution could be made easier, so people could benefit from being able to configure it within a quicker amount of time."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."
"If they could include some sort of web filtering, in-built antivirus, anti-malware, and data stream scanning in the next release."
"The solution’s technical support could be faster."
"The platform's cost needs improvement."
"The solution should be scalable, offering better pricing options as we optimize the network for coverage, capacity, and quality"
"The problem with this radio wireless technology is that it cannot compete in terms of bandwidth with the fiber optics at this moment. That's the biggest weakness."
"The product pricing needs improvement."
"Not a lot of technical engineers are familiar with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN. They are familiar with implementing and using other solutions such as Aruba. Therefore, Cambium Networks needs to be more visible in the marketplace."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless LAN with 138 reviews while Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is ranked 14th in Wireless LAN with 14 reviews. Aruba Wireless is rated 8.4, while Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Wireless writes "The portal for centralized management and virtual controller for APs are very valuable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN writes "Easy to configure; one of the cheapest solutions in the market". Aruba Wireless is most compared with Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and Huawei Wireless, whereas Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Instant On Access Points, Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Instant and ExtremeWireless. See our Aruba Wireless vs. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.