We performed a comparison between Aruba Instant On Access Points and Ubiquiti WLAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"The solution is very secure."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The simplicity is great."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"When an error or alert happens, I receive it in the application. I do not have to be there to know if something is wrong."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The solution is scalable."
"Aruba is much better than other vendors like Cisco and NETGEAR in terms of quality, price, and value for money."
"Its performance is very good. It suits small and medium sites very well."
"I would rate the stability of this solution a ten out of ten."
"With a variety of switches in their setup, they find that Aruba's online monitoring tools and configuration options for applications effectively manage most of their requirements, all while keeping the process straightforward and user-friendly."
"The most beneficial thing about Ubiquiti is that it is simple to deploy."
"would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. It is very scalable."
"The solution has a lot of great features."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"All of the interfacing is very good."
"The ease of use and simplicity of the solution is its most valuable feature. This tool is best suited for small environments."
"Ubiquiti WLAN is a reliable, stable, and robust solution."
"You can save backups of this controller locally and then I can export it to wherever I want."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"The price could be better."
"I believe there's room for improvement in the validation process, especially for customers facing compliance issues when managing access points from the cloud. It would be beneficial if the access points could also be managed from an on-premises controller. Regarding additional features, customers express interest in enhancing the controller, specifically improving the capability to manage a higher number of access points from the same controller. This feature is crucial for better scalability. Another feature that customers would appreciate is the ability to increase the number of access points. However, the current process for obtaining this permission can be time-consuming, and customers would like to see improvements in this regard."
"The solution's range could be better."
"While it is mostly scalable, there are some limitations."
"Software-wise, I would like to have a way of moving APs from site to site and wish there would be a way to add more APs to one site. I know the limit is 25 APs per site and I wish there were more."
"The tool's pricing is not good."
"If there's a way to get a floor map of our office space so we can place the access points on a map to be able to see what's what, where everything is going, where the most traffic is being connected, that would be a nice feature."
"It is scalable to a certain degree but not nearly as scalable and robust as your enterprise-grade solutions."
"The solution should include higher speed and lesser cost."
"The strength of the signal from the access points could be improved."
"Ubiquiti WLAN is not a cheap solution."
"The product's area of concern revolves around its lack of support."
"There seems to be a drop in service. It's definitely a reliability or stability issue we face."
"When I started to upgrade, the controller for Unbuntu was really struggling to start up, however, that has since been solved."
"The downside is the interface changes, where they are constantly doing firmware updates."
"Ubiquiti WLAN needs to expand the models with external antennas. It needs to improve stability."
"The product must provide better warranties."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Aruba Instant On Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Instant On Access Points is ranked 12th in Wireless LAN with 21 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 39 reviews. Aruba Instant On Access Points is rated 8.4, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Aruba Instant On Access Points writes "All-inclusive pricing, great for small offices, and simple to deploy and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Aruba Instant On Access Points is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Aruba Instant, Cambium Networks Wireless LAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and NETGEAR Insight Access Points, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless and Huawei Wireless. See our Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
