We performed a comparison between 4me and ServiceNow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like their request management as well as their project management."
"The multi-tenancy architecture, both in terms of functionality and reporting, is the best feature. It is a really well-thought, designed, and developed part of this product."
"It offers a comprehensive set of features without requiring additional payments for each feature."
"I find the incident management part to be the most valuable. That's how the service desk tracks tickets."
"There are many expansions available."
"It's easy to integrate. For instance, yesterday we closed the integration with SAP for the IP business management module to manage the forecast of projects. We created an interface between ServiceNow and SAP to control projects for accounting and on the forecast of the project. It was really easy. We don't have any problems with ServiceNow at the moment. As a company, they are improving constantly."
"The workflow capability for easy setup is powerful."
"It has an excellent capability to integrate different access points."
"ServiceNow was the first true enterprise to service management platform."
"I have found the workflows and integration the most valuable in this solution."
"What I like the most is that it's a common service data model and the fact that everything is available on one platform."
"We're still biased towards our previous, more mature product. 4me still needs to reach that level of maturity."
"One area where I believe there's room for improvement in the 4me system is the absence of an asset discovery tool."
"We would like to be able to customize and brand the solution, or at least the majority of its features and dashboards, particularly those that will be used by a large number of people."
"The major area for improvement for our needs would be monitoring the metrics of the times to acknowledge and resolve issues and escalations."
"There is a need to enhance ticket details visibility on the portal, such as displaying SLA information, which currently requires development effort."
"The visuals are the one area where there is opportunity for improvement."
"The customer service of the product right now isn't very good. It's an aspect they really need to improve."
"The asset management application could be improved. They have a lot of the infrastructure built, but it does not come with already made compatibility with some of the most popular vendors, such as Cisco and Microsoft. You have to fix it yourself."
"We do a lot of relatively advanced stuff for the size that we are, but ServiceNow itself is so big and to some extent, there is a significant amount of complexity that you have, a big learning curve I would say, in order to really get on board."
"Making a mobile version would be helpful."
"It's moving at a very fast pace. It is difficult for developers or engineers to keep up with it. That's the only issue."
4me is ranked 20th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 3 reviews while ServiceNow is ranked 1st in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 212 reviews. 4me is rated 8.0, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of 4me writes "Reasonably priced, easy integration, and workflow automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "A stable and scalable solution that has excellent features and is useful for collecting data and building KPIs". 4me is most compared with ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus and Zendesk, whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM, IBM Maximo and Appian. See our 4me vs. ServiceNow report.
See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.