We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Rapid7 InsightConnect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have no complaints about the features or functionality."
"What is most useful, is that it has a good connection to the Microsoft ecosystem, and I think that's the key part."
"Log aggregation and data connectors are the most valuable features."
"It's easy to use. It's a very good product. It can easily ingest data from anywhere. It has an easily understandable language to perform actions."
"The dashboard that allows me to view all the incidents is the most valuable feature."
"Free ingestion for Azure logs (with E5 licence)"
"The data connectors that Microsoft Sentinel provides are easy to integrate when we work with a Microsoft agent."
"Sentinel improved how we investigate incidents. We can create watchlists and update them to align with the latest threat intelligence. The information Microsoft provides enables us to understand thoroughly and improve as we go along. It allows us to provide monthly reports to our clients on their security posture."
"The solution provides threat intelligence with EDR."
"The most valuable features of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR are its overall track record and features that fit our use case."
"The Palo Alto ecosystem has a marketplace offering integration with Sentinel or other products."
"It is a scalable solution."
"For organizations that are stable with their security operations, like those with around 50 members in their security team running full-phased operations 24/7, Cortex is necessary."
"It has an extensive list of integrations that are available out of the box which makes it easy to start."
"I have no complaints about Cortex's stability."
"What I like most about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is how user-friendly it is for development. It is much simpler to work with compared to similar tools I've used."
"The tool is stable. The initial setup is straightforward. The product is user-friendly."
"If their UI was a bit more streamlined and easy to find when I need it, then that would be a great improvement."
"We'd like to see more connectors."
"We've seen delays in getting the logs from third-party solutions and sometimes Microsoft products as well. It would be helpful if Microsoft created a list of the delays. That would make things more transparent for customers."
"There is room for improvement in entity behavior and the integration site."
"The dashboards can be improved. Creating dashboards is very easy, but the visualizations are not as good as Microsoft Power BI. People who are using Microsoft Power BI do not like Sentinel's dashboards."
"Multi-tenancy, in my opinion, needs to be improved. I believe it can do better as a managed service provider."
"Add more out-of-the-box connectors with other SaaS platforms/applications."
"We're satisfied with the comprehensiveness of the security protection. That said, we do have issues sometimes where there have been global outages and we need to raise a ticket with Microsoft."
"The dashboard could be better."
"There is room for improvement in terms of the pricing model."
"The formats are not compatible, are readily not available, and are not readable."
"The solution requires DV but does not support open-source DV elastic searches."
"There should be an on-premise version available for customers to have different choices."
"The integration could be better. Cortex, for example, does not work with iPhone."
"For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added."
"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners."
"The technical support should be improved."
More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice →
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 2nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 42 reviews while Rapid7 InsightConnect is ranked 22nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 2 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.4, while Rapid7 InsightConnect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "Enables the investigators to go through the review process a lot quicker". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightConnect writes "Excellent security orchestration and automation AI features". Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Cortex XSIAM, Splunk SOAR, Fortinet FortiSOAR, Swimlane and IBM Resilient, whereas Rapid7 InsightConnect is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), CrowdStrike Falcon and Splunk SOAR. See our Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Rapid7 InsightConnect report.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.