We performed a comparison between Omada Access Points and Ubiquiti WLAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The simplicity is great."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The solution is stable."
"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."
"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."
"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."
"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."
"The initial setup is not complicated."
"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."
"The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance."
"The solution works well and in the short time I have used it, I've enjoyed its capabilities."
"would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. It is very scalable."
"The most beneficial thing about Ubiquiti is that it is simple to deploy."
"Ubiquiti WLAN has good performance."
"The most valuable feature is the level of security on the Wi-Fi network."
"The pricing is very competitive and the feature sets are very good. It compares well against more expensive options."
"For me, the ease of configuration is a valuable feature."
"The management features are valuable."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."
"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."
"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."
"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."
"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."
"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."
"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."
"The technical support could be improved."
"The support needs improvement. The official support is kind of complex. It's not that straightforward compared to Cisco and Aruba."
"The downside is the interface changes, where they are constantly doing firmware updates."
"The product must provide better warranties."
"The logs are not detailed enough. You can't clearly see what is being blocked in Ubiquiti WLAN, making the troubleshooting process a little bit harder."
"The product's area of concern revolves around its lack of support."
"Ubiquiti WLAN only supports 2.4GHz Wi-Fi radio and would be improved by including support for 5GHz."
"Cloud management is one feature that should be included in the next release. This tool is best suited for small environments, not large and complex ones."
"During the configuration, we cannot get information on the network level from the regular interface."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Omada Access Points is ranked 15th in Wireless LAN with 14 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 38 reviews. Omada Access Points is rated 7.6, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Omada Access Points writes "They have good specs, and the price is lower than competing solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Omada Access Points is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Instant, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Cisco Wireless, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Huawei Wireless and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi. See our Omada Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
