We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Trend Vision One - Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Anti-Malware Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a very solid security system, and the advanced hunting and everything really lets you dive deep into things."
"I find the vulnerability management section of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint to be very useful for organizations."
"It's a very complete application. I have all the controls in one site. I can track emails, attacks, and threats, and I can research information. I really like this configuration because I have all the information in place."
"It's really stable. I've used a lot of stuff, a lot of products, like ESET and Kaspersky. None of them are comparable with this one. This one is much better."
"It is a very advanced system based on AI. It has a very large database of places or sites on the internet where you should not go. It is continuously online."
"Defender is stable. The performance is good."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is its ability to bring together all the data, providing more information than just antivirus hits."
"This is not an inventory solution, but it helps you take count of how many workstations you have, as well as what software is installed on each of them."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"We encountered some issues when we were trying to enable automatic updates from our group policy."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint can improve by providing more and different types of reports."
"It should support non-Windows products better. Microsoft is now one of the leading vendors in the security area. So, they should be product-independent."
"The end-user also cannot do some advanced actions on it. It's a little bit complicated for our end-user, so it needs to be simplified."
"We would like more customization."
"Sometimes, there are different skews. In a basic skew, they should have basic log analysis without the need to integrate with any third-party or SIEM solutions, like Sentinel. This would make it so much easier for users who don't have log collection or log analysis."
"The management console is something that can be improved."
"The solution could always be more secure."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Anti-Malware Tools with 182 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Anti-Malware Tools with 17 reviews. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and AWS Security Hub. See our Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
