We performed a comparison between GuardDuty and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AWS GuardDuty is highly regarded for its extensive monitoring capabilities, threat detection, and ability to analyze various log sources. Trend Micro Cloud One is highly praised for its vulnerability scanning and ability to provide visibility into critical events. Users have suggested that AWS GuardDuty could improve by adding a mobile version and more dashboard analytics. Reviewers feel that Trend Micro Cloud One should enhance automation, simplify deployment, and offer more competitive pricing.
Service and Support: AWS GuardDuty customers are satisfied with the swift and helpful support they've received from the Amazon team. Cloud One users commended Trend Micro's support team for their extensive knowledge and expertise.
Ease of Deployment: AWS GuardDuty users described the initial as simple and quick. Some Trend Micro Cloud One users said the setup was easy, but others noted that it may pose a challenge for less experienced users.
Pricing: AWS GuardDuty offers a pay-go license, with different pricing tiers based on usage levels. There are no extra costs apart from the standard licensing. Reviewers say Trend Micro Cloud One isn't expensive per se, but the license could be more competitive. Trend Micro offers monthly, quarterly, or annual payment options. Additional services can be purchased at an added cost.
ROI: AWS GuardDuty improves security and builds customer confidence, helping businesses expand. Trend Micro Cloud One provides a versatile return on investment by offering effortless integration and cancellation options, and users have not reported any negative encounters.
Comparison Results: User reviews indicate that AWS GuardDuty is preferred over Trend Micro Cloud One. Reviewers liked GuardDuty's comprehensive monitoring capabilities and advanced threat response. Users find the setup process for GuardDuty to be simple and straightforward, whereas some users reported difficulties with Cloud One. GuardDuty also earned high marks for its reasonable pricing, but users say Trend Micro could lower the price of Cloud One to match competitors.
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"PingSafe's graph explorer is a valuable tool that lets us visualize all connected services."
"I did a lot of research before signing up and doing the demo. They have a good reputation as far as catching threats early on."
"PingSafe has a dashboard that can detect the criticality of a particular problem, whether it falls under critical, medium, or low vulnerability."
"It's helped free up staff time so that they can work on other projects."
"Cloud Native Security's best feature is its ability to identify hard-coded secrets during pull request reviews."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to gain deep visibility into the workloads inside containers."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"We use the tool for threat detection. AWS includes AI features as well. AWS GuardDuty gives us reports."
"With anomaly detection, active threat monitoring, and set correlation, GuardDuty alerts me to any unusual user behavior or traffic patterns right away, which is great for staying on top of potential security risks."
"What we found most valuable in Amazon GuardDuty is its threat detection feature, especially because we were monitoring a huge number of AWS accounts, so we needed a solution that would monitor for any kind of malicious activity. The monitoring aspect of the solution was great because it gave us timely notifications if and when anything happened, and Amazon GuardDuty helped keep us on our toes to make sure we took action right away."
"One of the advantages of cloud services is the ability to use them on demand. There's minimal installation involved; you can check the latest offerings and make new deployments while dismantling the previous ones. This approach keeps you ahead of potential services, showcasing the agility of AWS."
"The solution provides AWS GuardDuty S3 protection, EKS runtime protection, and malware protection."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The product has automated protection powered by AI/ML, which is now far more powerful than before. It uses AI/ML in its detection algorithm, providing fast and quick results."
"The solution will detect abnormalities in the AWS workload and alert us so that we can monitor and take action."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The security is good."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"here is a bit of a learning curve. However, you only need two to three days to identify options and get accustomed."
"I would like PingSafe to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations."
"I would like additional integrations."
"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."
"It would be really helpful if the solution improves its agent deployment process."
"The main area for improvement I want to see is for the platform to become less resource-intensive. Right now, it can slow down processes on the machine, and it would be a massive improvement if it were more lightweight than it currently is."
"We've found a lot of false positives."
"We can customize security policies but lack auditing capabilities."
"It is evolving, and at the moment, I will just need it on a larger scale. Then, it will satisfy my demand, initially."
"Some of the pain points in Amazon GuardDuty was the cost. When compared to some of the other services, depending on how many we had to monitor, if we had a huge range of accounts, as our accounts increased, we had a cost factor that came into play. Sometimes there were issues, for example, with findings that came up, we wanted to add notes and there were issues back then where notes couldn't be entered properly. If we wanted to leave a note such as "Okay, we have assessed this and this is how we feel", or "This is a false positive", Amazon GuardDuty wasn't allowing us to do that. Even with the suppression of certain findings, there was some issue that we had faced at one time. Those were some of the pain points of the solution."
"Because it's a threat detection service, they need to keep up with the various threat factors because new threat factors and attack factors come up all the time."
"It would be great if the solution had some automation capabilities."
"While sending the alerts to the email, they are not being patched. we have to do the patching and mapping manually. If GuardDuty could include a feature to do this automatically, it will make our job easier. That is something I believe can be improved."
"Improvement-wise, Amazon GuardDuty should have an overall dashboard analytics function so we could see what's in the current environment, and then in addition to that, provide best practices and recommendations, particularly to provide some type of observability, and then figure out the login side of it, based on our current environment, in terms of what we're not monitoring and what we should monitor. The solution should also give us a sample code configuration to implement that added feature or feature request. What I'd like to see in the next release of Amazon GuardDuty are more security analytics, reporting, and monitoring. They should provide recommendations and additional options that answer questions such as "Hey, what can we see in our environment?", "What should we implement within the environment?", What's recommended?" We know that cost will always be associated with that, but Amazon GuardDuty should show us the increased costs or decreased costs if we implement it or don't implement it, and that would be a good feature request, particularly with all products within AWS, just for cloud products in general because there are times features are implemented, but once they're deployed, they don't tell you about costs that would be generated along with those features. After features are deployed, there should a summary of the costs that would be generated, and projected based on current usage, so they would give us the option to figure out how long we're going to use those features and the option to keep those on or turn those off. If more services were like that, a lot more people would use those on the cloud."
"An improvement would be to have a mobile version where remote workers can log in and monitor and fix issues."
"AWS GuardDuty needs to be more customer-oriented."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"The pricing can get high."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS GuardDuty is ranked 4th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 20 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 17 reviews. AWS GuardDuty is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS GuardDuty writes "A stellar threat-detection service that has helped bolster security against malicious threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". AWS GuardDuty is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Wiz and Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and AWS Security Hub. See our AWS GuardDuty vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
