We compared SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on our users' reviews across various parameters. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a quick and smooth setup. The solution is praised for advanced threat detection, real-time monitoring, and comprehensive reporting, but users note room for improvement in UI, customization, and customer support. Users find Microsoft Defender's customer service excellent, with positive outcomes from utilizing the software, but suggest enhancements in system performance, UI, and threat detection capabilities. SentinelOne emphasizes protection and ease of use and Microsoft Defender highlights efficient threat prevention and seamless integration with Microsoft products.
Features: SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in advanced threat detection, real-time monitoring, easy deployment, and comprehensive reporting. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers robust security measures, efficient threat detection, seamless integration, a user-friendly interface, and effective management tools.
Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne Singularity Complete users find its setup cost to be reasonable, with flexible licensing options for scalability. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also offers competitive pricing and a straightforward setup process, making licensing hassle-free according to users. SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers higher ROI with comprehensive protection and ease of use, noted for better security measures. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint receives positive feedback but falls short in efficiency.
Room for Improvement: SentinelOne Singularity Complete could be improved with a more intuitive user interface, customizable options, enhanced reporting features, and better customer support. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint needs enhancements in system performance, UI, and threat detection for better scanning and threat removal.
Deployment and customer support: Users praise SentinelOne Singularity Complete for its quick and smooth setup. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has varied implementation times, ranging from three months to a week, highlighting potential extensive time requirements., SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers efficient, responsive, and knowledgeable customer service, providing quick response times and helpful guidance. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also receives high praise for prompt and effective assistance, with knowledgeable and responsive support.
The summary above is based on 534 interviews we conducted recently with SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Provides good vulnerability assessment."
"Defender is stable, I haven't had any problems with viruses when using it, and it's easy to update."
"We apply the DLP policies across a range of endpoints and it is very accurate when reporting vulnerabilities, including those in email attachments."
"I like Defender's reporting and logging features. The email alerts are also helpful. It's hard sometimes to sift through the email, especially if you're an IT firm managing hundreds if not thousands of endpoints, but we find email reporting useful. For example, last Tuesday, we learned of new vulnerabilities that were discovered as a result of the previous patches. The endpoints without those patches triggered alerts in Defender."
"The solution can scale as needed."
"It depends on the licensing. Most of the customers have got at least a 365 E3 license, and they can use most of the features of Windows 10 Defender. So, anyone who has got an enterprise license can start using those features. Some of the customers have got E5 licenses, and they can use all advanced features. Customers with E5 licenses use the advanced site protection (ATP) features and web content filtering without going via a proxy, which gives the benefit of replacing the proxy. They can get the benefit of MCAS and integration with Intune and the endpoint manager. It is a kind of single platform for all 365 technologies. It helps customers in managing everything through a unified portal."
"A few years ago, when I was using a different product, I was affected by a virus that destroyed everything. Since using Microsoft Defender, I have not had this kind of problem."
"It is easy to use because it is already pre-installed in Windows 10. We don't have to do anything to configure it. You can also configure the firewall by using a group policy so that it can be easily adopted in an environment."
"The protection and management provided by SentinelOne is good."
"I have been a Mac guy for twenty years, and the feature parity and the capabilities of a Macintosh agent are unparalleled in the industry. It is the first anti-malware and antivirus that does not make you feel that you bought the wrong processor. It is really good and lightweight."
"SentinelOne Singularity Complete, together with SentinelOne Vigilance, is an EDR tool with capabilities such as these, which I found valuable: the dashboard that shows you all the information and the power to either manually or automatically quarantine issues or threats in the environment."
"The Microsoft integrations are most valuable right now."
"The 365 management and analytics from the cloud is another great feature."
"The process visualization, automated response, and snapshotting are valuable. The integration and automation possibilities are also valuable."
"It has saved us from a couple of ransomware attacks already."
"The solution offers excellent detection and integration capabilities."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's licensing is confusing. It has conflicting information on the website. We also faced integration issues with other systems. It makes laptops slower than traditional antivirus systems."
"I wish they would extend the use of the Security Central portal, even for the free option of Defender. Because, as companies grow, it is labor intensive to manage the AV and detection part of it. For companies already subscribed to Office 365, I think this would be a good enhancement."
"The solution could always be more secure."
"The time it takes to restore the application could be improved. It has a lot of dependencies. It's not like the Microsoft security that comes with the OS. Updating through the command prompt, most of the time, it takes some time to download some of these dependencies."
"If the solution could be integrated more with Defender for Cloud, to be more unified, that would help. It is good now, but even more integration could be done with Defender for Cloud. We see two different portals. If Defender for Endpoint could be ported to the CSPM, Defender for Cloud, that would make things even easier for us."
"The product itself does not necessarily need improvement, but the support and implementation of the product are the disaster cases."
"Its user interface (UI) can be improved. Currently, in the console, you have to dig down for certain things. They've got many different layers to get to things instead of having it all on the surface. You have to go three folds lower to get to specific functionality or click a particular option. It would be good if we can manage the console through menus and instead of three clicks, we can do things in one click. They need to change the UI and work on it in terms of a better user experience."
"The interface isn't necessarily intuitive to a nontechnical person. You can get stuck in the little endpoint security portal. Sometimes, if you uninstall a competitive product, the end user doesn't always know if it's running or if they're protected even though it's silently running. There could be a notification, widget, or something that's resident on the screen for at least a bit, especially if you're doing remote support. You want to talk them through it, but sometimes, we're not allowed to look at the PCs we support."
"I'd like to see us be able to take action on one platform for items such as security variation, security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR)."
"All they need to do to improve it is for it to grow further. The hackers don't sleep. If the hackers don't sleep, the solution continually needs to be updated. They need to keep ahead of the hackers."
"We need to analyze the threats and make decisions based on that, so the analytics could be better at analyzing exactly where the threats are coming from."
"The area where it could be improved is reporting. They have some online reporting, but it would be nice to be able to pick and choose. When I'm looking at the console, I would love to be able to pull certain things into a report, the things that are specific to me."
"They can just continue adding more integrations with these big brands and software security products."
"It would be good to see some small tools to test files or hashes that are a potential threat, I know there are already products offering this."
"It's fine. It's correcting all the EFC files with a virus. All the achievements, maximum EFC files. Many EFC files will be flagged as a virus. Some virus databases need to be updated. The model is good at finding many EFC files. The trouble is it needs to be updated."
"Some of the reports that are exported through SentinelOne can be complicated for people who are not IT professionals. For example, we have some people within our leadership who would like to know why we are spending so much money on their product, and one of the ways that we are able to do that is through reports. Some of those reports are pretty easy to understand, and some of them are very complicated. Because they are not IT or security professionals, they may not have the same grasp. I wish their reporting feature was a little better."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 182 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 177 reviews. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Microsoft Intune, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, ThreatLocker Protect, Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Wazuh. See our Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors, best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors, and best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
