We performed a comparison between Kandji and Microsoft Intune based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."It's a very easy plug-and-play solution where you can just enroll the devices and choose the features you want."
"We are a remote company, and the product helps us manage the global endpoints. It helps us natively manage the endpoints in the cloud from anywhere."
"Its protection policies are most valuable. It protects mobile devices as well as individual apps. It is pretty scalable, and its documentation is also pretty good. It is also pretty straightforward to deploy."
"It's very informative when there is an error. It allows us to backtrace where the error is and resolve that ourselves. It's a bit of a Swiss Army penknife. We find that it fixes most issues."
"It works well if you have a Microsoft environment."
"Intune's unified endpoint management platform is invaluable."
"Users can make screenshots, and devices only need the minimal version of iOS."
"The reporting and analytics features in Microsoft Intune have been a lifesaver."
"I can reach devices or computers over the internet. I don't need to worry about the network connectivity between the offices. I can manage any device. That is the most important part."
"Kandji should give open customization."
"In the past, I raised some tickets for the enhancement feature, which was missing in Intune."
"I wanted to check if there is any provision at the Intune level to restrict certain things, such as a website, but unfortunately, that feature is available only in Microsoft Defender. Intune has web filtering capabilities, but they are only useful for protection from malicious websites, whereas we would like to be able to restrict a website. For example, YouTube is a clean website. No one would identify it as a malicious website, but if we want to stop the end-users from going to that website, we have to go for another product, such as Microsoft Defender or another third-party proxy solution. It would be great if this capability is included in Intune."
"There can be some added features, such as an improved dashboard. Any new feature that could be a benefit to our customers would be good."
"It needs certificate provisioning for S/MIME purposes."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"Lacks the ability to deploy more ways of management, managing devices and processing the policies."
"The initial setup is a little bit complex."
"In future releases, I would like to see better integration with Apple products."
Kandji is ranked 18th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review while Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 165 reviews. Kandji is rated 7.0, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Kandji writes "An easy-to-manage and deploy solution, but it should provide open customization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". Kandji is most compared with Jamf Pro, CrowdStrike Falcon, Open EDR and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Entra ID and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.