We performed a comparison between Jamf Pro and Kandji based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about JAMF, Microsoft, Kandji and others in Mobile Device Management (MDM)."It works pretty well for us."
"The most valuable features are the ones that make sure that the deployment is of a standard operating system and the Zero Touch deployment, which is very useful. This allows users to have an out of box experience."
"The mobile application management, MAM, is the most useful aspect of the solution."
"The most valuable features in Microsoft Intune for me are application deployment, Defender deployment, and asset management."
"It's not working perfectly, but Microsoft's Autopilot offers great visibility into automated deployment solutions."
"Autopilot is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune."
"One of the main features of the solution is it allows the management of many devices in different ways."
"Intune can wipe devices. For example, if a disgruntled employee wants to leak the data on their company phone, Intune can terminate their access and wipe the entire device with a click."
"The ease of use and access allows us to manage all of our devices collaboratively."
"The action and trigger is the main thing for us. We like the kind of repetitive script which we can use there."
"Jamf Pro allowed us to patch and manage endpoints while collecting log data to help improve operational efficiency."
"The most valuable features of Jamf Pro for me are the device locator, which helps find missing iPads, and the ability to remotely manage and disable devices."
"To have a zero-touch setup for the Macs and iPhones is more valuable than one can think."
"The ability to put a device into a lost mode state that will report locations as it checks in has allowed us to retrieve so many lost devices."
"Some of the most valuable features for us include remote management, DEP enrollment, and zero-touch deployment."
"I found that automated enrollment is very powerful because you can bring standardization to the environment."
"It's a very easy plug-and-play solution where you can just enroll the devices and choose the features you want."
"There are items that require improvements. One is the controls from iOS."
"Microsoft Intune could improve by being more user-friendly and having it geared toward device management. The graphic interface is not very good."
"It would be good if, in addition to the minimal patching and compliance, we could also use Intune for application deployment. For instance, if a device is not patched, Intune should have the ability to push not only a Microsoft patch but also other patches, such as a browser patch."
"There needs to be more support for Mac operating systems."
"Microsoft Intune needs to improve the initial login process."
"The closest Microsoft Intune can be to GPOs, the better. There needs to be more granularity on application deployments. However, they have done better recently with the application deployments."
"I'd like some more reporting so that I don't have to delve into PowerShell and I can pull more of the local device information such as memory, apps installed, etc. It would be nice to be able to see the apps that are present there but might not be managed. For example, if they installed 7Zip, it could report that back via an installed program or feature to see what was currently installed."
"It would be nice to have a location tracker for the mobile device management tool. I'm not sure if it exists but hasn't been configured or if it's missing, but we've been unable to utilize the location features."
"The self Service UI needs some real improvement; they recently revamped the app, but I don't know if those changes have been for the better."
"The new remote support tool is still lacking features compared to other industry solutions."
"We would love to see the ability to have settings apply to mobile devices on a time schedule. This would allow us to plan some tasks ahead of time."
"There is room for improvement with Jamf Pro, especially regarding updates."
"I would like to see either a report section or an integration with a new reporting module to allow us to pull real metrics from the system easily."
"The cheaper Jamf School is also a product that has been acquired and decked out to meet more educational needs for a good price. Some features of Jamf School aren't (yet?) available in Jamf Pro and for educational users/customers of Jamf Pro, it would beneficial to have these available in the Pro version too."
"Simple things like finding policies, configuration profiles, and smart computer groups that are not used by any client could be easier."
"It would be amazing if they would give Apple TV management its own space in Jamf Pro and not just mix it in with devices."
"Kandji should give open customization."
Jamf Pro is ranked 1st in Mobile Device Management (MDM) with 103 reviews while Kandji is ranked 4th in Mobile Device Management (MDM) with 1 review. Jamf Pro is rated 9.6, while Kandji is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Jamf Pro writes "Customizable with a self-service portal and a good security posture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kandji writes "An easy-to-manage and deploy solution, but it should provide open customization". Jamf Pro is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl, Microsoft Configuration Manager and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), whereas Kandji is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Open EDR and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
See our list of best Mobile Device Management (MDM) vendors and best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Device Management (MDM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.