We performed a comparison between HPE Nimble Storage and VMware vSAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Storage."Having an intuitive user interface to get things running is great."
"The speed is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"The most valuable feature is that maintenance is free."
"We also use VMware integrations developed by Pure, their plugins in our vCenter environment. They help by allowing our non-technical operations teams to deploy new data stores and resize data stores without me having to involve myself all the time to do those simple tasks."
"I find two features of Pure Storage most valuable. The first is the "safe mode" function, and the second is its simplicity."
"The scalability options are very nice because you can scale it much better and faster. The scalability was there in the previous environment also, but this is far better than what we had before. It basically helps the user in case they are looking for more storage. We can scale it much faster."
"Lone segmentation is simpler and more agile. It's improved the velocity in overall provisioning from project to operation."
"I like FlashArray's ActiveCluster as well as its snapshot and cloning capabilities."
"We get storage access without the need for more human monitoring of those resources."
"The deployment is fast."
"We like the performance."
"I use InfoSight quite a bit. It works well. It allows you to get some insight into what's happening in your environment immediately, instead of having to send things off and having them analyzed and sent back to you."
"The most valuable feature is the management of Nimble Storage, InfoSight. This is like a cloud. That's really a very nice feature. I think that's the only reason to buy Nimble Storage."
"The most useful features are high availability and the storage snapshot backup functionality."
"It dynamically understands what data is being stored on it and where to store it, because they have got a flash array at the front, then obviously the standard style of storage at the back."
"The most valuable features are its cost-effectiveness, performance, and its deduplication deficiencies."
"All orchestration and monitoring are routed to the cloud."
"Flexibility, growth, and expansion are probably the more important features for us. As our environment grows, the more users come on, the more VDI workstations that we need, we can easily expand either horizontally or vertically with the environment"
"There is not a lot of maintenance required."
"The most valuable features for us are the ability to scale out the nodes independently, and the flexibility of the nodes. We can put almost any type of server in there with our connectivity and everything works great."
"The newer versions of this solution are much more stable and easier to manage."
"Instead of going for SAN storage, customers can use the scale-up and scale-out features of VMware vSAN."
"The most valuable feature is fhe flexibility, the ability to move the machines around without hesitation."
"vSAN is very integrated."
"When we were doing some tests, we found that there was an I/O freeze when they were switching the controller."
"Larger capacity and more storage ports would be the two things I'd like to see."
"The scalability of the solution is not as good as it probably could be."
"It would be nice if Pure had something in its portfolio that provided higher deduplication and compression for backups."
"The primary drawback is the cost, which can be prohibitive for small configurations."
"The 3PAR SSD arrays that we have are still failing a lot so even though we're under warranty, we still have to get someone out and usually have someone troubleshoot so that usually adds onto the cost. With Pure, we've had a disc fail and we pop it out and you pop it in and it's good to go."
"It goes at about 95 percent, so we have had some performance issues. It is hard to clear them."
"There are many features which need to be added, particularly on the replication side."
"A feature that would be a nice addition to the next release would be a filer option. A filer option so that you could connect the sim or NFS or chips like NetApp does for NAS functionality."
"The stability can be improved."
"I would like deduplication by default on all the volumes. I still don't understand (or know why) dedupe isn't enabled for the templates out-of-the-box. We have to go in and manually enable it each and every time."
"Nimble requires its DNS to work in order to interface with VMware vCenter is a little thorn in my eye, but I am being nitpicky here."
"I would like to see more advanced analytics in the next release of this solution."
"More reporting is probably the only thing that is really lacking. It would be helpful to go to the business and say, "This is how we've evolved with our solution, and this is why we need more." Being able to put forward a business case with data to back it up, essentially."
"Nimble Storage could increase its flexibility by adding more protocol options. Nimble mainly uses fibre channel protocols, whereas many other storage arrays support fibre channel, iCSI, and NFS protocols."
"It would be ideal if all these enterprise-class high-performance products would come at a cheaper price."
"It could be cheaper."
"If the support could be provided more quickly, it would be very helpful."
"I would like more integration with the hardware when it comes to disc types and supporting the newer types of storage."
"It would be much improved if we could somehow integrate a better backup with it. Right now, we're using Veeam and it's okay, but I would like more of a VDP vSAN solution. That would be excellent. The VDP, at least the last time we looked at, it was just not quite there."
"More focus has to be put on deduplication and compression with a hybrid architecture."
"There is a lot that VMware could improve from a marketing perspective. The cloud is still new for many people, so extending storage should be effortless. It shouldn't be so complicated to extend the storage so workloads can access it no matter where they go."
"I would like to be able to limit IOPS."
"It is an expensive solution."
HPE Nimble Storage is ranked 5th in All-Flash Storage with 119 reviews while VMware vSAN is ranked 2nd in HCI with 226 reviews. HPE Nimble Storage is rated 9.0, while VMware vSAN is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HPE Nimble Storage writes "Beneficial management software, straightforward installation, and good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSAN writes "Very stable, easy to set up, and easy to use". HPE Nimble Storage is most compared with Dell Unity XT, Dell PowerStore, HPE Primera, IBM FlashSystem and NetApp AFF, whereas VMware vSAN is most compared with VxRail, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, HPE SimpliVity, Red Hat Ceph Storage and StorMagic SvSAN.
We monitor all All-Flash Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.