We performed a comparison between GTB Technologies Inspector and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."
"The product has a centralized console for everything."
"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."
"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."
"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."
"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."
"This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."
"Trend Micro has improved my client's organization by recovering malware disabled network adaptors from servers."
"It is a scalable product."
"I'm not an administrator of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, but an end-user, and what I like about it is that it can detect events that could cause data loss. It's a good solution."
"We use Trend Micro mainly to monitor user activities, such as tracking the websites they visit and purchase items. Additionally, we focus on identifying and addressing antivirus threats. We used to explore a feature related to proxy but decided against it as an enterprise solution wasn't readily available for us. Our primary use of Trend Micro revolves around end-user security. Integration with Active Directory has proven beneficial, allowing us to easily push updates or changes directly from the console."
"There are no issues with the interface."
"The interface and dashboard are okay."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The basic setup, like configuring servers or deploying the SaaS platform and agent implementation, is straightforward."
"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."
"The performance could be better."
"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."
"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."
"The solution’s performance must be improved."
"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."
"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."
"Typically, DLP solutions do not cover emails without an additional component, which necessitates a dual-service proposal. Comparatively, on-premises deployments offer more features locally than online or remote deployments, which sometimes face challenges with feature support. This is a common issue with Trend."
"In Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, there is a need to improve the plug-in manager, as it is an area with shortcomings."
"It's hard for me to answer any questions about missing features. It's the outside companies who support us that manage this DLP solution at this moment."
"I would like to provide improved network direction in order to regulate all of the user agents. We only use Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention to manage various threats and malicious user agents currently."
"Trend Micro could be priced better, currently, it's a bit high. And there needs to be better after the sale, technical support."
"The platform's support structure for government-specific domain requirements could be improved."
"Within the solution, many of the functions do not perform as intended...It is not a stable solution...It is not a scalable solution."
"Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution."
More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
GTB Technologies Inspector is ranked 16th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 7 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 13th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. GTB Technologies Inspector is rated 8.2, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of GTB Technologies Inspector writes "An affordable and scalable product that has a good dashboard and a centralized console for everything". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". GTB Technologies Inspector is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Digital Guardian, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP and Digital Guardian. See our GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.