CucumberStudio vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SmartBear Logo
46 views|21 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
GitHub Logo
991 views|906 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and GitHub CoPilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface.""The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful.""The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."

More CucumberStudio Pros →

"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time.""The initial setup of the product is easy.""The document generation features are valuable.""The product is easy to integrate.""The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates.""The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features.""The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities.""When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."

More GitHub CoPilot Pros →

Cons
"The reporting needs to be improved.""I would like to see better customer support.""I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."

More CucumberStudio Cons →

"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages.""Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required.""The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required.""GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement.""GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required.""In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results.""The suggestions provided by the product must be improved.""There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."

More GitHub CoPilot Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
  • "GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
  • "A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
  • "It's affordable."
  • "There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
  • More GitHub CoPilot Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process.
    Top Answer:Presently, when I work with Selenium, I need CucumberStudio just to make my project readable to other people, and for reporting, I use Maven. I think it would be better if we could also do the… more »
    Top Answer:I recommend the solution as it's easy to use. I rate the solution seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution.
    Top Answer:I have not used the product much to be able to comment on what needs improvement in it. With the passage of time, I believe that there will be improvements in its prompt response, like ChatGPT… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    46
    Comparisons
    21
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    378
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    991
    Comparisons
    906
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    451
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Hiptest
    Learn More
    SmartBear
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Formerly HipTest: CucumberStudio is the leading collaboration platform for BDD - an easy-to-use tool to define ideas, test code, and learn in production from real-time insight.

    Trained on billions of lines of code, GitHub Copilot turns natural language prompts into coding suggestions across dozens of languages.

    Sample Customers
    Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Educational Organization10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Wholesaler/Distributor7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Non Profit13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Insurance Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise43%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise56%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid Application Development Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: April 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CucumberStudio is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 9 reviews while GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 10 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.0, while GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". CucumberStudio is most compared with , whereas GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM and ServiceNow.

    See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.