We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"It is a stable, reliable product."
"The best thing about Grafana is the visualization. The colors and the ease of use make it very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the UI dashboard because we need to create a dashboard on Grafana to monitor our data."
"It excels in providing comprehensive details when there are downtimes or fluctuations, offering thorough reports."
"Grafana is able to connect with multiple data sources, unlike Elasticsearch."
"It has good stability."
"The comparison feature is very good."
"The initial setup is straightforward with just a few clicks on the solution's cloud."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"There are some areas of network drives that are not showing as expected based on server usage."
"It would be helpful if Grafana provided more information and training on how to use Prometheus."
"Lacks event management which affects our DevOps people."
"I have a problem with Grafana in the area of documentation."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"The solution has room for improvement with a better API to help automate the construction of the dashboards easier."
"The main drawback is the necessity for endpoint monitoring."
"Writing queries can be a bit difficult because the syntax must be maintained."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Sentry, New Relic, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and VMware Aria Operations for Applications. See our Coralogix vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.