We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Datadog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"Most of the features in the way Datadog does monitoring are commendable and that is the reason we choose it. We did some comparisons before picking Datadog. Datadog was recommended based on the features provided."
"It lets us react more quickly to things going wrong. Whereas before, it might have been 30 minutes to an hour before we noticed something going on, we will know within a minute or two if something is off, which will let us essentially get something back up and running faster for our customers, which is revenue."
"Datadog is easy to use and easy to deploy. It's a better solution compared to others on the market in terms of being budget friendly for our customers."
"Datadog's ability to group and visualize the servers and the data makes it relatively easy for the root cause analysis."
"The solution's SaaS model is easy to manage and works well in single- or multi-cloud environments."
"The seamless integration between Datadog and hundreds of apps makes onboarding new products and teams a breeze."
"Datadog has made it much easier to have a central place for people to look for logs and made it much easier to notify them of any elevated error rates or failures."
"Having a wealth of information has helped us investigate outages, and having historical data helps us tune our system."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"It does not have the best interface."
"The FinOps needs improvement."
"Datadog isn't as mature as some of the established players like Dynatrace or Splunk. It's a new product, so they are constantly releasing new features, and I don't have much to complain about."
"Deploying the agents is still very manual."
"Alerting timing should be improved to be more fine-tuned and exact."
"Datadog could make their use cases more visible either through their docs or tutorial videos."
"When it comes to storing the logs with Datadog, I'm not sure why it costs so much to store gigabytes or terabytes of information when it's a fraction of the cost to do so myself."
"The parallel editing of the dashboards should not cause users to lose the work of another person."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Coralogix is most compared with Grafana, Sentry, New Relic, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and OpsRamp. See our Coralogix vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.