We performed a comparison between Cisco Cloud Services Router and Juniper MX Series Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Overall, it is a solid product and a good router."
"The bandwidth and throughput are pretty good."
"This solution is scalable."
"It connects all the accounts with the weaknesses, and this is what we were looking for. Also, it connects with the on-premise side."
"It handles stress very well. We have not reached a point of needing to worry about its capabilities."
"AWS has a reference architecture to enable the Cisco routers in high availability and Transit VPC. This is a very powerful router and can enable us to use Transit VPC in AWS, and this is a very powerful feature that we use."
"It seems pretty stable. We have never had any issues with it."
"The most valuable features of the Cisco Cloud Services Router are the integration with Amazon and Oracle cloud."
"The most valuable feature is the capacity of the throughput for the firewall."
"Users are able to easily configure the whole solution via simple data."
"We are able to easily build chassis with Juniper MX Series Routers."
"I have found the most useful features to be layered VPNs, IPsec, VPLS, and firewall filters."
"It is a very stable product."
"The flexibility of the MPLS configuration is very good."
"The most valuable features for us were related to our transition into MPLS technology, specifically for BPN and VPN services."
"The solution is pretty easy to set up after a bit of training."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"It could grow or adapt to changes in the cloud. For example, cloud does not support autoscaling. When people want to grow, they have to do manual activities."
"I would like some deployment examples and guides specific to AWS VPCs and how to separate your subnets. Then, how they tie-in with the Internet gateway and any NAT services that we are running on our VPC. This would be extremely helpful."
"They have an online registration that happens after they pick up block months. If they could decrease to yearly or something, sometimes the device is not cell phone accessible. That becomes an issue or challenge for us. If that can be improved, that would be really great."
"It does the job, but it's not cloud native. It could be even better, like having a single pane of glass and being less expensive."
"The ease of use within the AWS environment needs to improve. Sometimes, it is very esoteric in how you use it. Therefore, you have to learn to use it, then you are able to."
"Technical support could be better. I am missing a single pane of glass, where I can see all the connections, etc."
"There should be a system in place to help existing users make an easier transition to the newer interfaces."
"It is too complex. It is not easy to set up, even with the documentation that they provided. It is a little confusing."
"The integration could be better."
"One thing that the product can do better is clustering. Rather than just having two of them, it would help if there was one cluster to extend to more notes in the cluster itself."
"The security features could be better."
"We'd appreciate it if they had a better GUI. It would be more flexible for the customers that way."
"The solution could improve by providing enhancements to built-in SDN or SDWAN."
"The pricing is a bit too high."
"Finding market expertise is hard."
"The solution could improve by providing better training to allow more sales of the solution in the market."
Cisco Cloud Services Router is ranked 8th in Routers with 17 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. Cisco Cloud Services Router is rated 8.0, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Cloud Services Router writes "Useful for smooth migrations, high availability, and simple deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". Cisco Cloud Services Router is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, HPE Enterprise Routers and Huawei Enterprise Routers, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch and ExtremeRouting. See our Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.