We performed a comparison between Cisco Enterprise Routers and Juniper MX Series Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its ability to implement layer three protocols and layer two protocols like OSPS in BSS and BSC environments, with the Nexus Cisco 7000."
"The product can scale."
"The stability is very good."
"The most valuable features are security and throughput."
"Cisco Enterprise Routers are simple. Everything is in a proper manner. You don't need to upgrade or do other things on a daily basis. Cisco sends you the updates, and they are automatically updated. They are good."
"This solution helps us with our inter-network constitution, and that works for us."
"The routing platform is good."
"It has provided us a more secure environment, especially the firewall. We've had multiple attempts of network intrusion which have been defeated due to the firewall rules in place."
"The most valuable feature is the capacity of the throughput for the firewall."
"The solution is pretty easy to set up after a bit of training."
"I would say it is very user-friendly."
"On the SRX, the firewall is very easy to configure, especially when you want to filter out traffic."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers has a CLR and it's more reliable and faster than others."
"For the Juniper MX Series Routers, it plays a crucial role in our network. They offer numerous features, enabling multiple connections and handling various reports. The routers efficiently manage the number of switched fabric codes and process features based on the specific switch requirements. Previously, I utilized them for processing and addressing customer-side concerns. The routers have excellent documentation, making it easy to resolve any issues that may arise. It's excellent for customization, especially in tailoring the Windows configuration environment. Overall, dealing with this solution has been straightforward and efficient."
"It's one of the more stable routers."
"I have found the most useful features to be layered VPNs, IPsec, VPLS, and firewall filters."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Tends to have a short life cycle."
"The overall price of Cisco Enterprise Routers should be reduced, it is expensive."
"The product would be more scalable if it could operate with other brands."
"There needs to be an integration with SD-WAN for the solution."
"The solution could be priced better."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"The solution is expensive and difficult to manage."
"It would be better if Cisco had a User Interface (UI) that we could configure from a web browser. Right now, we only have a Graphical User Interface (GUI). I would like to see a new UI with a dashboard for configuration in the next release."
"There is room for improvement in pricing. The product could be cheaper for smaller networks."
"If you are setting up a site-to-site VPN between a Juniper and Cisco device then you may encounter some issues."
"While it is challenging to pinpoint specific areas for enhancement, there is room for better support and updates for Ansible."
"Better documentation to assist with implementation would be helpful."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"The setup was a bit complex."
"The web interface can be improved."
"Most IT equipment now has graphical interfaces, and there is a need for the Juniper routers to have a more intuitive web interface."
Cisco Enterprise Routers is ranked 2nd in Routers with 101 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. Cisco Enterprise Routers is rated 8.6, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Routers writes "Allows us to configure NAS through Cisco activities and to create GRE channels with different sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". Cisco Enterprise Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, HPE Enterprise Routers, OneAccess Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, HPE Enterprise Routers and ExtremeRouting. See our Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
