We performed a comparison between Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Cisco Umbrella based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, BitSight and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."The solution is user-friendly."
"Offers open ports from an external point of view."
"I prefer BitSight due to its patch management capabilities. The score is a valuable feature. I have contacted the customer support through e-mail and their response rate is fast. I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"Its customer service team responds quickly."
"The product helps us identify the vulnerabilities of internet-facing applications."
"The weekly reportings are great. The investigation is super and the application management is equally great."
"The most valuable features for us include tenant lock, content filtering, and DLP solutions, looking for PII and information being exfiltrated."
"I like the original functionality, which allows for providing secure DNS services."
"What we like most is security and how easy it is to integrate with other appliances."
"Web proxy adds an effective layer for security."
"It's very stable, reliable and does its job."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to filter malware sites that could infect clients or allow them to download infected files."
"The solution is extremely stable. It has excellent performance."
"At the moment, when the vulnerability score decreases, it remains the same for quite a while, even though issues are resolved in 24 hours."
"There may be room for improvement in the methodology for identifying findings, as occasional errors occur on the technical side."
"Data enrichment is the major issue."
"The solution’s benchmarking should be improved."
"Its factor analysis feature could be better."
"I would like to see more integration between Cisco Umbrella and Cisco DNA Center."
"I would like them to make some videos, practical videos, the kind with steps that people can use to learn and deploy"
"It could be more secure. It would be better if they provided a transferring proxy as an add-on and more integration."
"This solution does not give us full, 360-degree protection."
"Its price could be better."
"I would like to see more integrability with other products."
"The pricing could be improved."
"Some countries don't have a DNS server leading to a domain resolution IP, not at a local level."
More Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management is ranked 2nd in IT Vendor Risk Management with 5 reviews while Cisco Umbrella is ranked 1st in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 108 reviews. Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management is rated 8.6, while Cisco Umbrella is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management writes "User-friendly solution with robust patch management capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Umbrella writes "Protects endpoints wherever they are, always pushing people to the right locations to avoid malicious intent". Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management is most compared with SecurityScorecard, RiskRecon, Microsoft Secure Score, UpGuard Vendor Risk and Tenable Lumin, whereas Cisco Umbrella is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Palo Alto Networks DNS Security and Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.