We performed a comparison between Automic Automation Intelligence and Redwood RunMyJobs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Action Packs are a good feature."
"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."
"The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."
"Multi-platform scheduling makes it easier this way rather than accessing one platform at a time."
"Installing and configuring Redwood agents are easy, and scheduling jobs on Redwood helps in triggering the batches as per business requirements."
"There are various ways in which you can construct jobs depending on your business needs and requirements."
"Redwood is of value to our organization due to of its ease of use and the ability to automate and orchestrate any platform that we utilize today."
"With automation in place, employees can focus on more strategic tasks that require human expertise, increasing overall productivity."
"There won't be a memory outage issue, as it uses its own server/ECC memory only."
"The automated alert response is very useful for long-running and failed jobs during off-business hours."
"Our team was able to integrate it with the ITSM tool as well as security monitoring tools to make the incident creation process automatically feasible."
"The job reporting feature needs improvement."
"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."
"Integration of the solution could be improved."
"The job log has a size limit."
"Having a graphical user interface for the dashboard would be great."
"Redwood Software has a high price tag, especially for small and medium-sized businesses that might not have the funds to engage in a complete automation system."
"The dashboard provided can be made more visually appealing and could include more critical data that would help associates in one glance get the required information."
"The user interface of Redwood can be improved a bit to make it more user-friendly and interesting."
"Enhancing the user interface would make it more appealing and accessible to a wide range of users."
"We need the ability to pull data into an Excel format."
"It lacks some of the common reporting features. I'm a bit surprised that there aren't some standard reports to be able to extract any data on usage. They've described to us that customers have different reporting needs, so they let them develop those, but reporting is a common need. It would be helpful to have it as part of the solution."
More Automic Automation Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Automic Automation Intelligence is ranked 19th in Workload Automation with 3 reviews while Redwood RunMyJobs is ranked 3rd in Workload Automation with 30 reviews. Automic Automation Intelligence is rated 8.6, while Redwood RunMyJobs is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Automic Automation Intelligence writes "Useful multiple scheduler, centralized batch view, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Redwood RunMyJobs writes "Simple to use, increases CPU speed, and reduces the cost of machine time". Automic Automation Intelligence is most compared with AppWorx Workload Automation, AutoSys Workload Automation, Automic Workload Automation and Control-M, whereas Redwood RunMyJobs is most compared with Control-M, Stonebranch, Tidal by Redwood, AutoSys Workload Automation and ActiveBatch by Redwood. See our Automic Automation Intelligence vs. Redwood RunMyJobs report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.