We performed a comparison between Snyk and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Snyk is highly regarded for its developer-friendly approach, seamless integration, and ability to automatically generate pull requests. It particularly shines in software composition analysis and supports container usage. Trend Micro Cloud One is praised for its extensive range of features, strong vulnerability protection, and real-time server security. Snyk users say the solution could improve in terms of compatibility and reporting while expanding its vulnerability database. Trend Micro Cloud One should focus on providing equal support for AWS and Azure and enhance its automation capabilities.
Service and Support: Reviewers say Snyk should overhaul how it organizes and prioritizes requests. Trend Micro Cloud One was commended for its exceptional and easily accessible technical support. Users value the expertise and knowledge of the Trend Micro team.
Ease of Deployment: Most Snyk users found the setup process uncomplicated, but some needed professional guidance. Difficulties arose when collaborating with multiple developers and integrating Snyk with specific tools. Some found Trend Micro Cloud One easy to set up, while others found it complicated. It could pose challenges for individuals without a background in IT or information security. The deployment time varied depending on the complexity of the system.
Pricing: Snyk has a higher setup cost than other solutions, while Trend Micro Cloud One falls in the middle. Snyk offers a free open-source version, whereas additional services for Trend Micro Cloud One come at an added cost. The view of Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is generally positive.
ROI: Snyk provides a budget-friendly option for detecting vulnerabilities in open-source software, which may offset yearly subscription costs. Trend Micro Cloud One offers a versatile return on investment and smooth integration without any reported issues.
Comparison Results: Snyk emerges as the favored choice compared to Trend Micro Cloud One. Users like Snyk's developer-oriented approach and valuable functionalities like automatic pull requests and software composition analysis. They also highlight its compatibility with containers and accurate identification of security vulnerabilities. Trend Micro Cloud One users want more automation and a more comprehensive feature set.
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"We noted immediate benefits from using the solution."
"Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features."
"PingSafe's integration is smooth. They are highly customer-oriented, and the integration went well for us."
"The real-time detection and response capabilities overall are great."
"It's helped free up staff time so that they can work on other projects."
"The offensive security feature is valuable because it publicly detects the offensive and vulnerable things present in our domain or applications. It checks any applications with public access. Some of the applications give public access to certain files or are present over a particular domain. It detects and lets us know with evidence. That is quite good. It is protecting our infrastructure quite well."
"PingSafe's graph explorer is a valuable tool that lets us visualize all connected services."
"Static code analysis is one of the best features of the solution."
"Its reports are nice and provide information about the issue as well as resolution. They also provide a proper fix. If there's an issue, they provide information in detail about how to remediate that issue."
"The most valuable features of Snyk are vulnerability scanning and automation. The automation the solution brings around vulnerability scanning is useful."
"Snyk is a developer-friendly product."
"The solution's vulnerability database, in terms of comprehensiveness and accuracy, is very high-level. As far as I know, it's the best among their competitors."
"A main feature of Snyk is that when you go with SCA, you do get properly done security composition, also from the licensing and open-source parameters perspective. A lot of companies often use open-source libraries or frameworks in their code, which is a big security concern. Snyk deals with all the things and provides you with a proper report about whether any open-source code or framework that you are using is vulnerable. In that way, Snyk is very good as compared to other tools."
"The solution has great features and is quite stable."
"Snyk has given us really good results because it is fully automated. We don't have to scan projects every time to find vulnerabilities, as it already stores the dependencies that we are using. It monitors 24/7 to find out if there are any issues that have been reported out on the Internet."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"There's room for improvement in the graphic explorer."
"While it is good, I think the solution's console could be improved."
"One of our use cases was setting up a firewall for our endpoints, specifically for our remote users... We were hoping to utilize SentinelOne's firewall capabilities, but there were limitations on how many URLs we could implement. Because of those limitations on the number of URLs, we weren't able to utilize that feature in the way we had hoped to."
"When we get a new finding from PingSafe, I wish we could get an alert in the console, so we can work on it before we see it in the report. It would be very useful for the team that is actively working on the PingSafe platform, so we can close the issue the same day before it appears in the daily report."
"We recently adopted a new ticket management solution, so we've asked them to include a connector to integrate that tool with Cloud Native Security directly. We'd also like to see Cloud Native Security add a scan for personally identifying information. We're looking at other tools for this capability, but having that functionality built into Cloud Native Security would be nice. Monitoring PII data is critical to us as an organization."
"Cloud Native Security's reporting could be better. We are unable to see which images are impacted. Several thousand images have been deployed, so if we can see some application-specific information in the dashboard, we can directly send that report to the team that owns the application. We'd also like the option to download the report from the portal instead of waiting for the report to be sent to our email."
"I would like PingSafe's detections to be openly available online instead of only accessible through their portal. Other tools have detections that are openly available without going through the tool."
"Some of the navigation and some aspects of the portal may be a little bit confusing."
"Could include other types of security scanning and statistical analysis"
"There are some new features that we would like to see added, e.g., more visibility into library usage for the code. Something along the lines where it's doing the identification of where vulnerabilities are used, etc. This would cause them to stand out in the market as a much different platform."
"Compatibility with other products would be great."
"Offering API access in the lower or free open-source tiers would be better. That would help our customers. If you don't have an enterprise plan, it becomes challenging to integrate with the rest of the systems. Our customers would like to have some open-source integrations in the next release."
"The product is very expensive."
"The solution could improve the reports. They have been working on improving the reports but more work could be done."
"It would be great if they can include dynamic, interactive, and run-time scanning features. Checkmarx and Veracode provide dynamic, interactive, and run-time scanning, but Snyk doesn't do that. That's the reason there is more inclination towards Veracode, Checkmarx, or AppScan. These are a few tools available in the market that do all four types of scanning: static, dynamic, interactive, and run-time."
"It can be improved from the reporting perspective and scanning perspective. They can also improve it on the UI front."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Snyk is ranked 4th in Application Security Tools with 41 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 13th in Application Security Tools with 17 reviews. Snyk is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Snyk writes "Performs software composition analysis (SCA) similar to other expensive tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Snyk is most compared with SonarQube, Black Duck, GitHub Advanced Security, Fortify Static Code Analyzer and Veracode, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and AWS Security Hub. See our Snyk vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
